content : … the page is an overview of ‘the book Enoch’  and especially concerning “the locusts” theme ;  we do not (yet) have the original text of it  but either way we’d need to form a general idea of the addressed themes even befóre restoring , so let’s start with our current important one :   [conclusion : Enoch confirms ‘the locusts’ :]

                                                                                 theme
 

    …. though the book Enoch proved to be helpful in ‘describing the south-land 
    as the shore of Heaven containing the mountain carrying the Eden paradise’ , 
    many other sections were corrupted by Esau and that in a peculiar way     —  
 
     origin of the book
    … discarding the ‘Slavonic Enoch’ book which is an obvious fraud , we have 
    the Hebrew and Ethiopian version , and though it would be interesting to go
    look at the hebrew text [-if we can obtain it]  it will not make Sense anyway
    without first assessing what it must have contained ;
    all the themes are about the Eden-region followed by ‘a dream-vision’ that
    reads like a future vision akin to Daniel 11 ; but because this whole book is
    like a blueprint (‘template’) of the future it MUST have contained the theme
    about ‘the corruption and restoration of the Scroll’ 
    [-where this theme was corrupted in Enoch’s (alleged-) “vision” , ofcourse]  ;
 
    concerning Enoch himself ,
    it is possible that he was “a prophet during the 700-500 BC Ishral time” but
    the overall theme shows such a consistent buildup about ‘the other reality’
    that indeed he may have lived in the days before Noah    —
    for the context feels “as if God wanted to claim the ‘word’ theme” as a 
    kind of “setting the stage” concerning “His spoken word” through which all 
    the enemies would fall in the latter days — and that Enoch was His scribe ,
    almost ‘as foreshadowing of you & we’ !
    curiously chapter 69 has a (corrupted-) line about this ,
    as (moved-) lines about “the fallen ones” and “the written + word” in the
    context of “people + not + understanding” where ofcourse the ‘fallen ones’
    must have been about ‘Adam’ or by extension ‘the sons of Esau’ 
 
    the book in Ethiopian
    … ancient Egypt had a curious relation with the lands to her south ;
    described as ‘Nubians’ it would refer to present Sudan but by extension 
    also to Ethiopia , where even at times the Pharaoh was of Nubian origin ;
    and where the hard-core Egyptian mindset was that of ‘the sons of Ammon’ 
    she was also represented by the offspring of the serpent-race just as we 
    recently saw in the PyramidTexts — as the oldest Egyptian Spells — but later
    also at the start of the Ptolemaic period with their ‘Horus the Child’ ;
    it implies that some time after 200 BC Alexandria – the time of the corruption 
    of the Scroll – Ethiopians serving the (Greek-) Egyptian court must have taken 
    the Scroll together with the by then also corrupted ‘book Enoch’ back to their
    land Ethiopia where they transponded both manuscripts into their own now 
    extinct Ge’ez language ;
    we know that the attribute of Cush is “the serpent-race” and they may have
    recognized this aspect (-as the reason they took those books with them) as
    anticipating their deliverance , suggesting these were the forefathers of our
    own Cush group that are part of our 144,000 … 
           sub :
          not to complicate things ,
          but “the book of Job” also appears to be ‘very old’ , where the figure of 
          Job himself seems to be “a Cushite” – and the main theme his attribute
          of ‘the serpent-race’ even into ‘the locusts’ (chapter 39 + 41) ;
          while it appears that this book was corrupted in similar way to the one
          of Enoch here , by swapping sections and the way of using phrases 
 
    type corruption
    … clearly the Esau son(-s) corrupting this book had many problems ,
    especially because of the solid build-up of the main theme (Eden) as a very
    logical sequence of events and reasonings that were intended for you & we 
    to understand [-hence Enoch says so at the start of the book !]  , 
    helping us with the context of the many themes      —
    Esau ofcourse saw that , and apart from his usual corruptions he frustrated 
    exactly this solid buildup — for example “Enoch leaving this earth where he
    first sees the matrix-gate (‘in which was no love’) but then enters the gate 
    of Eden (the Throne room of God) ; and from there he receives as it were
    a Tour through the south-land ;
    where Esau mutilated this logical buildup so that ‘the location of Eden’ is
    unclear , suggesting she was ‘on earth’ ; and about ‘the tree of good & evil’
    as if it was IN the Eden garden — alike his corruption in Genesis ;
    but he also mutilated the entire theme of “Adam” :
    in chapter 22 – very corrupted – Enoch is shown “four pits that are storing
    souls until the day of judgment” but the key word here is “being separate” 
    where it can’t have said “a separate pit” since prophets (Is.14) address the 
    judgment of Adam after which “he will descend to Sheol where he will be
    separated from the other (sic) demons” as if in a separate cell ;
    likewise , chapter 54 has “Sheol opening its jaws” ,
    which in prophets is said about “many of Jacob entering inthere because
    of the corrupted scroll that Adam initiated” — and these examples reveal
    that much móre must have been said about ‘Adam’ (-and the Scroll) ,
    but Esau must have systematically corrupted all these references here …
 
    overall this indicates how God gave a complete future-vision unto Enoch
    which he faithfully recorded , yet just as Esau particularly corrupted the 
    theme of ‘Adam’ , likewise he did with ‘the four cherubs’ (‘locusts’) one :
  
 
                          two events : ‘the fallen ones’ and ‘the locusts’ 
 
    … though several interesting themes still survived in the present book
    our first interest now is the ‘locusts’ one aka ‘the four sons of (and) Horus’ ;
    problem is “that several groups are judged at the end of the book” but all
    so corrupted that it’s hard to make out what type judgment for whom , for
    Jacob or the Ammon sons or the serpents (locusts) or even ‘Adam dying’ ;
    so that we are left with a main juxta and the interpretation of that section :
 
                                     ch.5-13      >>>>>>>>>      <<<<<<<<<    ch.69
                     the fallen ones                               the fallen ones = the locusts
 
    chapters 5-13 describe the fallen ones (Ammon sons) that came to earth
    before the days of Noah : their number is given (200) and also the reason
    for judgment upon them (causing Giants) while several of their names are 
    mentioned (-whether true is another question) ,
    but the overall theme — apart from Adam’s role that was hidden — is solid 
    and matches the events as described in Genesis ;
 
    now please – in the larger prophet books God explains a theme at the start 
    then repeating it at the end , which seems to have been the buildup here 
    as well because in chapter 69 again ‘the fallen ones’ are described yet now
    something fishy is going on with the attributes there :
    suggesting that no ‘fallen ones’ were intended but ‘the locusts theme’ per
    the context of the lines , so that  alleged “book of Noah” (two sections as
    chapters 60-69 and the closing) must have been about this subject — 
    besides , why would ‘Noah’ separately álso “write another book” ? :
 
     the buildup to the ‘locusts’ theme
    … as shown below Esau very much cut & pasted the relevant sections in 
    a frenzy to frustrate any solid buildup : if you remember Revelation where
    John enters the Eden gate and the subsequent descriptions ,
    here , after ‘the gate’ (in 14) even mentioning the sea of glass and the
    corner-stone (continued in a much later chapter however) , logical would
    be the description of “the four cherubs there” — eventually followed by the
    portals of the Eden land (cube) which they rule 
    [as Esau’s “24 + elders” in Revelation that we still are trying to figure out]  ;
    but see what he did in order to confuse us : 
 
 ch.14 : [after the matrix-gate now-]  the Eden gate – the Throne room ;
[other chapters] 
ch.40 : [NO ‘four arch-angels’ but is about-]  the four cherubs
[other chapters] 
ch.76 : the [4 x 3]  portals for the winds [-in the Eden-house] 
[other chapters] 
ch.34-36 : the portals in the cube [-ruled by the cherubs] 
[other chapters] 
The Book of Enoch: Book of Noah–a Fragment: Chapter LXIX
chapter 69 : the locusts (-stealing the Eden-atmosphere) : see text (here) :
   (2-3)
   mentions “21 names” – of the alleged ‘fallen ones’ ,
   adding “as chiefs over hundreds , fifties and tens” ,
   which may have said about Horus and his four “as being 5 in number” ;
   (4-5) 
   (4) “The name of the first Jeqôn: that is, the one who led astray ⌈all⌉ the sons 
   of God, and brought them down to the earth, and led them astray through the 
   daughters of men. 5. And the second was named Asbeêl: he imparted to the 
   holy sons of God evil counsel, and led them astray so that they defiled their 
   bodies with the daughters of men.”
   … a huge Red flag here :
   why , after naming them , go start again with “the first” ?
   the “sons of God” likely were “the cherubs of God” and “their crowns” ,
   while not “daughters of men” was intended but “the daughter of tsiun”
   as the Eden-mother by whom the locusts-serpents got their eden-body ;
   (6)
   “And the third was named Gâdreêl: he it is who showed the children of men 
   all the blows of death, and he led astray Eve, and showed ⌈the weapons of 
   death to the sons of men⌉ the shield and the coat of mail, and the sword for 
   battle, and all the weapons of death to the children of men.”
   … here ,
   ofcourse ‘coat of mail’ jumps out – as ‘breastplate’ and ‘sword’ (axis) but
   the line is mixed up : perhaps first ‘the chisel’ theme was mentioned , that
   followed by their morphing bodies into locusts “with breastplates” ;
   (8-12)
   [probably moved from ‘the fallen ones’ section ,
   for it talks about “(corruption of the-) written word” – and see earlier !] 
    next lines are the core :
        (16-20)
       “And they are strong through his oath: And the heaven was suspended 
        before the world was created, And for ever. And through it the earth was 
        founded upon the water, And from the secret recesses of the mountains 
        come beautiful waters , From the creation of the world and unto eternity.
        And through that oath the sea was created , And as its foundation He set 
        for it the sand against the time of (..) anger , And it dare not pass beyond it 
        from the creation of the world unto eternity. And through that oath are the
        depths made fast, And abide and stir not from their place from eternity to 
        eternity.”
    bingo  —
    whatever it exactly said it is  ‘the stolen Eden-atmosphere theme’ !
    but then the section gets unclear :
    in next 21-23 again show “the windows in the Eden house (cube)” being ruled
    by the four cherubs , which can either be a deflection – because Enoch already
    addressed that , see above — or it can have said “stolen fróm those windows” ;
    (25-29)
    [closing — likely corrupt / misplaced / shortened ;
    though ‘a judgment’ is mentioned we need a more extensive ‘restoration’]  

                                                                           conclusion 
 
    … after having cross-examined the phrasings in every chapter as the themes
    we might need , the ‘locusts one’ appeared to be the final subject wherefore
    the closing section was not about “the miraculous baby Noah being born” but
    about ‘us understanding the birth of the locusts through the eden-mother’ ;
    the other themes mentioned ,
    such as ‘the seventy shepherds’ (in ch.90) was our ‘Babylon 70 years’ theme
    so that all the themes we can think of do show (though corrupt) in this book ;
    there however is 1 problem still , 
    per chapter 81 that talks about “the heavenly tablet” that among other things
    would show the names of all the Originals ; and the problem is that the epos
    of Sumer álso describes “the tablet as the ME which Marduk hung around
    his neck (-euphemism of ‘stolen from eden’) ;
    though we know that our Eden birth-sceptre links her restored main axis ,
    the latter may or may not be represented in the form of ‘a breastplate’     —
    for Legal reasons we must maintain this possibility obviously because of the
    high-priest wearing the breastplate but also because of the locusts wearing 
    their stolen version — we’re just not sure yet how the birthsceptre / axis theme
    would be represented : perhaps ‘as breastplate’ … ?