[an extension of the base 10 theme] 
 

this appears a bit unusual proposition , but since in previous (page) the “children in the streets”  turned out to be a corruption of ‘the two heavens’ theme we have a good chance that Esau pulled the same here   ‘Thophet’ mainly shows in but two chapters (Jer.7 & 19) and seems to be about “having sons go through the fire” yet the main theme is the sin done on ‘the high places’ , which is “worshipping the 12 months of the matrix-year”, that we found linked to “the children” theme ; and to be honest , we just don’t believe that even the stubborn Ishral kings would “let their sons pass through the (Moloch) fire” like the heathens indeed burned their children as sacrifice — but instead ,                                                        that their stubborn rejection to keep the 10 month year was the reason for ‘the downfall of Ishral and of Judah’ with an awful consequence for the times of the end , when Esau would start to murder our children , preventing that all the tribes would be reuniting again  – by us understanding the same theme they rejected !!!

a ‘Thophet’ in Carthage (Africa)   with the sacrificial altar shown   * this did not exist in old Ishral *

 
does this sound palpable please ..?

                                                                                   theme
 
     … though indeed so attested that both Ishral and later Judah went into exile 
     because of their type kings that rejected base 10 got the upper-hand over the good
     kings that returned to IEUE and restored the Eden year of ten months ,
     we do not believe that certain of their wicked kings ‘burnt children as sacrifice’ even
     the KJV text mentions (two times or so) “.. letting their sons pass through the fire” ,
     for the fact that this act is too unnatural for any Jacob-soul , even for wicked ones ,
     and second because the command always was ‘to keep the 10 months’ 
     where a (continuous-) breaching of that command would result in a correction ,                       <<<
     and there is ‘no need to trump that’ with gruesome events ,
     so that the latter must have been inserted by Esau to conceal the 10 months theme
 
     no ‘Topheth’ — and probably not even a ‘valley of the Son of Hinnom’ 
     which is the first thing we need to tackle ;
     in Jeremiah 7:31 as “the·Topheth (!) which in·Ravine-of~Ben-Hinnom” ,
     but “There is no archaeological evidence for the Tophet at Jerusalem, so that we are 
     reliant on the biblical descriptions to understand it.” [wiki]  ; yet scholars defending the
     KJV consider the word through a foreign root to mean “hearth, fire” linked to sacrifice ,
     or from the hebrew root for “drums” that would sound to conceal the death-cries ;
     where Gesenius (from the Strong’s list) has it as “spittle” ;
     however , in our case ,
     it is much more logical — and elegant — that its origin relates to “children” , 
     and indeed it appears as ‘little children’ (-taph) during the Exodus when Pharoah 
     after another plague pleads Moses to leave and take all the children (-taph) with him ;
 
     then the ‘ravine’   —   
     [also]  this phrase seems to have been invented by Esau — where he went back in the 
     scroll to add this phrase into earlier books in order to give this term some legitimacy 
     [and he used this same method for a range of subjects and word-roots !]  ;
     we know nothing of this alleged ‘Hinnom’ while in Joshua 15:8 where it first appears 
     as ‘conquered geographical location’ it feels a bit .. unnatural to read , as if it were
     glued to another original name as the shown “valley of the Rephaim (‘a type giants’)” 
     which somehow makes much more Sense
 
     b) the ‘valley – ben – Hinnom’  originally as ‘two – sides of – heaven’ [triplet] 
     in previous pages we saw how Esau used several versions for his ‘Gog & Magog’ 
     adding the weird “half (!) tribe of Manasseh” that was “the two halves of heaven” ,
     while in previous page we had anóther version of that ,   
     as “the children – in head of – the streets” where “streets” was “sides” (-chts) ,
     and we cannot rule out that this was another type corruption of that same theme ; 
     now ,
     even the roots do not match in this occasion , the (taph) , context and rhythm dóes ,
     as ‘the·Topheth = the children (thopheth=taph)    +
          [=linked to]  – the valley=two – son=sides of – hinnom=heaven (innom=shmim)‘ 
          as ‘the two of – sides’  and as complete expression ;
 
     c) and [per KJV]  that will be ‘the valley of – slaughter’ [“Armageddon”]  
     in KJV , after his phrase “Thophet in the valley of ben Hinnom” it adds a conclusion
     said as “… but that valley will be called the valley of slaughter” (-harag) that later in
     Greek form came to show as “(h-) Ar(m)ag(eddon)” ,
     but because the ‘slaughter’ is our theme we need to be careful here :
     the ‘slaughter’ should pertain to ‘the children’ but Esau corrupted the reasoning ,
     which in our case should be “the enemy keeping Ishral and Judah separated” ,                            <<<
     through the murdering of our children ,
     and perhaps adding “so that in the end time both houses would be slain (-harag)” ?                
     either way ,
     the whole “Armageddon” idea is an absolute Hoax , and see next ,
     for the alleged ‘two armies’ are but Esau’s corruption of “the two sides of heaven”  
 
     d) slaughter [of Jacob]  and of ‘Gog’ Horus [Ez.39]  as ‘two heavens’ theme 
     line 33 has , though tampered ,
     a “And the carcases of this people shall be meat for the fowls of the heaven [..] ” ,    
     but in this context :
     wé know that first the Jacob souls will be delivered after their vow unto God ,
     when the restored remnant will have gone through the world , explaining them ,
     and that only after their vow their body will die 
     [though God may not have disclosed this aspect to old-Judah in this chapter , 
     but just have explained the gruesome consequence of their choice]  ;
     now please ,
     after (the souls of-) Jacob will have been delivered ,
     it probably “doesn’t matter anymore whát happens to their carcasses”, right ,
     but look at this connection ,
          — the ‘carcasses (-on the field)’  here looks like                                                                                [+ ‘birds’] 
          — the ‘carcass of the Adam-man falling down upon the field’  and
          — the ‘(carcasses of Horus & co) falling on the field’ (Ez.39:5)                                                 [+ ‘birds’] 
     here ,
     it feels like “the standard judgment of the transgression against both heavens 
     is to fall dead upon the field + being eaten by birds” 
     (perhaps because ‘the field’ is in the middle of the two heavens..?) ,
     and as a type judgment both true for Jacob and for Horus & co ,
     yet with the crucial difference that (the souls of-) Jacob will be delivered first !
 
     both chapters [this Jer.7 and Ez.39]  share the same core theme :
     where this chapter is about ‘the high places’ [base 12] 
     in the “queen of heaven” corruption (18) of the ‘Behemoth & Leviathan’ theme ,
     Ez.39 has ‘the prince [‘Horus’]  (or another title)    +
                             ruling meshek=Behemoth and tubal=Leviathan (THUbl=LUTHn)“
     where Horus & co now rule both of these through their base 12 ,
     but by means of the Eden base 10 that Adam sold to him ;  
          [sub :
          yet this chapter remains tricky , even for us  —
          the “cleansing of the·land (!) [for]  seven months” (in 12)
          must have been ‘cleansing of [=both realms]  [by]  the (eden) 10 months’ 
          or especially that of the northern corrupted Behemoth realm ;
          in (14) “continuance – they shall separate”  
          as “they [‘both realms’]  will continually be separated” ,
          where “the field (-upon which they fall)” must be ‘the south-land’ between the
          mountain of tsiun [-and Eden]  until the tree of good & evil in the east , as the
          region they dwelt upon in pre-Eden times , in the first place , but the dead 
          bodies of Horus & co (and perhaps larger army) now as trophy for God ;
 
          in (15) it has “they will be buried in the valley of Hamon-Gog” ,                                                       <<<
          but since the south-land has no such valley with such name it should refer 
          back to the crime through which he sustained his matrix base 12 ,
          by his serpent (-race) sons upon this earth having murdered our children ,
          but the text-buildup is so altered that a full restoration seems impossible 
 
                                                                                             II
                                             why ‘sacrificing to baal’ is base 12 worship 
 
         “Inscriptions are most common in the Carthage tophet [=see the photo in top] 
          where there are thousands of examples. There are some from other tophets 
          as well, and Matthew McCarty cites CIS I.2.511 as a typical inscription:

                        To Lady Tanit,                                                                     [‘Leviathan realm’] 
                        face of Baal,                                                            [‘matrix 12 month year’] 
                        and to Lord Baal Hammon,                                       [‘Behemoth realm’] 
                        [that]  which Arisham son of Bodashtart, son of Bodeshmun vowed ; 
                        because he (the god) heard his (Arisham’s) voice, he blessed him.[46] “
 
          here, Esau may have had this ‘Baal Hammon’ in mind for his ‘Ben Hinnom’ ,
          but it’s crystal clear that the sacrifice was directed to the dual-realm and the
          matrix-base 12 to keep ruling them ,
          just as we saw with the Sumerian-Babylonian ‘Bel — Belitya’ in the Akitu ;
 

to right : one of the many ‘tombstones’ of the ‘tophet’            of Carthage which were monuments from each that           had sacrificed a child of theirs ;           the ‘sign of Tanit’ shows, almost as an ānkh-symbol           next to the astral signs, moon and sun,            oftentimes with a tree (the matrix world tree axis ?)           and curiously ‘the sign of the bottle’ where in Jer.19           God tells Jeremiah to make a point concerning this           theme of ‘the high places’ by “breaking a bottle”             (but we still need to see if that was original or not) ;           where sometimes the priest and the child showed

 
 
    now considering the sacrificing of children to Moloch ,
    which factually is the very same type and has the same goal as the above one ,
    quote ,
         “Planetary Offerings : Specific offerings were placed into these chambers 
           based on the astrological significance of the respective planets. Medieval 
           commentators elaborate that worshipers believed that making offerings  
           to these astral bodies through the fire of Molech would draw down cosmic 
           energies , aligning human fate with the movements of the planets. [1, 2] “
    but in reality about base 12 ;
 
    yet perhaps it helps to let the sons of the serpent-race themsélves inform us 
    [all quotes taken from Sefaria org]  ,
    “Medieval rabbinic commentaries, including the Yalkut Shimoni and classical 
    midrashic literature, detail how idolatrous practices like the worship of Molech 
    were deeply intertwined with ancient astrological and cosmological systems. 
    [1, 2] 
    These texts often explain the worship of Molech not merely as literal child 
    sacrifice, but as an advanced celestial cult practiced across the ancient Near 
   East. Rabbinic tradition highlights several intersections between the idol and 
    the cosmos: [1] 
          – the Seven Compartments [=’read : stolen base-7′]  : the Yalkut Shimoni 
             and other medieval exegetes (drawing on earlier talmudic treatises like
             Avodah Zarah) describe the Molech idol as a hollow brass structure
             [=‘again, compare “the bottle” in Jeremiah : as the matrix Torus ?‘] 
             divided into seven distinct compartments.” 
             Tosefta Chullin 2:6
         “One who slaughters in the name of the sun, the name of the moon, the 
            name of the stars, the name of the [zodiacal]  constellations, for the 
           sake of Michael [=‘Thoth !’]  , minister of the great army, or for the sake of
           a small worm, behold, [in all those cases]  this is [considered like]  the meat 
           of offerings to the dead [….]” 
           [remember we saw in Sumerian Akitu also these offerings to the dead
           notably “to the captured corner-stone” – with goal to kéep it imprisoned !] 
            Tikkunei Zohar 59a:5
           “And furthermore: the Shekhinah [=’glory’]  is the calculation of seasons, 
             and zodiacal constellations, and calendrical months and leap years.”  
            [……] 
            And furthermore: 
            She is the precept of ‘the slaughter of animals’ , 
            which is kasher when performed by strangers [Var. women] ’, 
             for there are people who are compared to animals […..] ” 
 
                 etcetera — much more would come up IF we wanted to really look ….
 
       the Golden Fleece :
       “In another mythological tradition, the zodiac sign Aries (the Ram) actually 
        originates from a myth about escaping child sacrifice by fire. In the Greek 
        mythology, King Athamas is tricked into attempting to sacrifice his children, 
        Phrixus and Helle, to end a devastating drought. Before they can be killed, 
        a flying ram with a golden fleece (sent by their mother) swoops in to rescue 
        them from the sacrificial altar. This ram was later placed into the heavens as 
        the constellation Aries.” 
 
         the above examples alone could not sufficiently support our theme
         but here they are added to the major finds already listed in main index