| [theme] : part II : with ‘the 70 sons at Sinai’ started our 70,000 remnant as the prophecy for the end time [concept restored from Ex.24, Ex.18 and Num.11] as virtual proof of the 70 days from Passover till Acceptance [and probably it included the ‘Esau murders our little ones’ theme] [2026-07jul.11-13] |
| … continuing here the theme of the previous page about the “70 days from Passover to Acceptance” through the sacred 7 multiplied by Eden’s base 10, but it doesn’t end there : we opted that because of God’s time fractals as “7 years > 7 months > and 7 days (‘one week’)” this triplet could cause the ‘1000’ through base 10 to come to ‘70,000’ as the number of the remnant , and here a major proof of the 70 days must show , by 70 sons at Horeb on the day of Unleavened moreover , the restored text shows a prophecy that this group carries the remnant in the end time |
who didn’t wage ‘literal war’ but guarded Eden concepts |
theme
though ’70 elders show together with Moses on the mount’
we need to proceed carefully because the theme was totally corrupted by Esau ;
while it never ceases to amaze us how after all these years the Scroll still shows
themes that we had not discovered still — or rephrased : ofcourse we have seen
these ’70’ but since it had no proper embedding there was no need to engage it ..
Exodus 24
a ’70 elders’ right away shows in line 1 , but what happens with them is unclear
since the text buildup is very distorted while it seems that sections are missing ;
now ,
first we need to make sure that indeed ’70 people‘ were intended ,
(1)
“And he said unto Moses, Come up unto the LORD, thou, Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu,
and seventy of the elders of Israel ; and worship ye afar off.”
here ,
later lines suggest a ’70 – sons of – the 10 – tribes of – Ishral’ since the term
‘elders’ is most vague while the entire theme centers around ‘numbers’
[we don’t believe that the two evil sons also went up but we leave that for now] ;
and indeed these should be ‘people’
because a time frame shows in a later verse ,
(16)
“And the glory of the LORD abode upon mount Sinai, and the cloud covered it
six days and the seventh day he called unto Moses out of the midst of the cloud.”
but ,
we know that Moses (and the 70) first ascended “at the last day of Unleavened”,
so that ,
‘… and it (would) cover – the·cloud (!) = Moses – [for] six=nine – (more-) days=weeks
[=for] – Moses – (would) call=stay – [on] the on=mount (al=er) +
[=until] – the·seventh = the seventieth – day [….. 2x unknown ….] ‘ ;
here ,
the “nine more weeks” specified as “until the seventieth day” feels appropriate ,
while the text indeed must have connected the ’70 sons’ to ‘the 70th day’
what is the role of the ’70 sons’ ?
all they do here is “confirming the words of IEUE”
but only because Esau has distorted the real reason for their presence here ;
however lines 4-7 are suspicious :
the “building an altar with 12 stones” is a cunning way to hide the base 10 theme
especially combined with the “half of – the·blood (!)” as “the halves of – heaven”
which is about Eden’s 10 month year ruling the Behemoth and Leviathan realm ,
as the proper theme belonging to these seventy sons ,
and moreover of God’s Covenant (line 8) which He just had declared at this day !
at this point we need to assume “that He started a remnant of the people”
which He would maintain throughout the later generations that would go astray
even up to our very day now ,
and that these 70 separately vowed to keep the 10 month year as their response
(in 7) “all that IEUE spoke we will do”
[even though line 3 has the same, but as said Esau messed with these chapters]
the 70 probably waited [there] ‘until the 70th day’
Moses tells them “to wait here for [=me] until [=I] will return to you” (as in line 14) ,
where the ‘here’ probably was a place halfway up the mount (see 4) ,
but here is the problem please —
we know that the 10 months were to be ‘vowed’ (-ndr) at the day of Acceptance , <<<
yet it seems logical that God through Moses first explained to them whý He had
asked them to come up the mount , and because it makes little sense how after
this ‘they would descend again’ they perhaps remained there until the 70th day ;
[inserted :
similar seems to happen in Ezra 10 where “the princes are to stand (wait)”
who must be ‘the leaders” of the two (?) tribes that returned from exile ,
probably starting “at the twenty [+first] day of the ninth=first month” (9)
for it must be the same day of Unleavened that the 70 went up the mount ,
until “the one=seventieth day of the the·tenth=third month” (in 16) ;
where the whole theme is ‘vowing base 10’ and rejecting the strange year ;
resumed :]
but in this case there may be another important reason as well :
for perhaps by context the 70 sons encamped there until the day of Acceptance
since they were called and ‘installed’ as remnant in the week of Unleavened
[as the sacred fractal being part of the ‘7 years > 7 months > 7 days (‘a week’)] ,
so that they themselves represented the concept ’70’ as 7 x base 10 ,
and it even was required that they would remain until that day of Acceptance ;
moreover , perhaps also ‘as continuation’ —
namely “as bridge to the second phase”, so to speak, starting with the souls
that would be accepted by God from that same day onward because of Christ ,
and since the first christians were our ‘caretakers’ this day is also valid for us
[in the sense ‘that we finish what they started’ in the new situation] ;
as the day that He ascended , of which He likely said that the same day would
be the day He returns — and compare the foreshadowing of that in the example
in Daniel 10 shown as “the 24th of the [=3d] month”, see previous page
however , we can not find Christ as ‘the angel of IEUE’ showing at Acceptance
in the examples here but we suspect that Esau has done this :
— the 70 introduced + the corrupt ‘two heavens theme’ [in this ch.24]
— the corrupted prophecy about the 70 [see below ch.18]
— and the angel of IEUE as part of that prophecy [from line 20 of ch.23]
because ,
(20) has “I send [+my] angel” that (in 21) “will bear your transgression” (=body) ,
which feels as an intro to the mentioned ‘second phase’ at which’ end the final
remnant will come into being — though also this section is terribly corrupted ,
while any phrase about “Him gathering that remnant” is lost now
[sub :
not to complicate things but adding it here :
last year we were with the “Aaron being dressed in the pretty priestly garment
then waiting seven days at the gate of the outer court” which we placed at the
day of Atonement and then were forced to extend to a ’70th day’ that seemed
almost impossible – and indeed didn’t work out since nothing happened ,
yet how curious that the basic concept appears to be valid , after all ?
now , Esau totally distorted the buildup of Lev.8 ,
but if the 70 sons waited until the seventieth day then perhaps Aaron did also ,
yet only dressed pretty AT that seventieth day as it represented our Originals
— while perhaps no evil ‘two sons of Aaron’ were present “but the 70 sons” ;
— and it does show ‘a wave offering’ (in 27) but which must be “of wheat” ,
— where the silly “(blood upon-) the right hand and big toe of the right foot”
feels like an overdone corruption of the dual ‘Behemoth and Leviathan’]
because “God would always keep a remnant throughout the generations”
[though as a concept that would only be fulfilled in the days of the end time]
we must assume “that these 70 had no part in the built statue by the people”
through which God had to reject the people at the day of Acceptance —
wherefore , in context , it makes sense that He first ‘installed’ the 70 ,
so that their vow to keep the 10 months would counter their people , right ,
as the very reason that He would not destroy all of Jacob ,
where actually these very days our remnant is doing the very same thing !
and perhaps superfluous to mention ,
but the *fact* that the 70 were installed at the final day of Unleavened
for us strongly suggests that our situation must have started at Atonement
[or to be more precise : after Trumpets as ‘the restoration of the Scroll’ ,
by which our sisters & brothers would be added through their atonement] ,
as a crossing over to next year’s divine Spring feasts
which is the hopeful theme right now ,
after the so devastating fail — by misunderstanding — in Autumn last year ..
missing here : ‘the prophecy’ :
if the above assumption is correct we would need a link to ‘the latter days’ ,
perhaps by a phrase as “the sons of your sons”, or ideally “days of the end”
or even ‘70,000’ as (twice) the number of the final remnant ,
but Esau has cut off this prophecy, hiding it in seemingly unrelated chapters ,
though one shows a “seventy men prophesying” as an important clue for us :
the prophecy
the 70 becoming 70,000 [Num.11 & Ex.18 ‘Jethro’ !]
but now it gets very difficult :
Esau rewrote this prophecy in two versions to cover up this important theme ,
disarming it by his story “Moses needs men to help him rule the many people”
which sóunds valid but is just another invented plausible deniability by him ;
fortunately in one of them shows the “70 men + prophesying” and for the rest
containing the same keywords and context as the other one (see below)
so that originally it must have been the prophecy belonging to this theme
[inserted :
is this like the insanely corrupted “Saul prophesying” 1Sam 10 chapter ? ,
where “he will meet 3 men holding 3 breads” and “a company of prophets
coming down from the high place (sic)” when “he will wait seven days” :
we’re a 100% sure this was the same theme , also by the many keywords ,
but perhaps unrestorable — for it reads as if this Esau first had swallowed
a load of drugs before ‘rewriting’ the chapter ;
and mentioning this here since God made sure that a pattern of this theme
would show throughout the scroll, however as examples that systematically
were corrupted by Esau into whatever Insane version he could think of … ]
comparing both chapters ,
Numbers 11 Exodus 18
— Moses burdened by the people — Moses burdened by the people [quote] [#1]
— not able alone , too heavy for me — not able alone , too heavy for me [quote]
— 70 men will stand with him — chiefs of 50 and 10 will stand with him [#2]
— a dual ‘Eldad & Medad’ — a dual ‘Gershom & Eliezer’ [#3]
(Gog & Magog ‘Behemoth’ theme ?) (two alleged sons of alleged ‘Jethro’)
(the men are imparted something)
— the seventy are prophesying
(main theme : ‘[not] die to flesh’ ?)
— 600,000 footmen : was ‘70,000’ ? — 1000s and hundreds [#4]
our greatest problem is ‘how exactly this prophecy was phrased’
for we have many ‘gaps’ (or actually ‘one large gap’ ..) in the reasoning of it ,
caused by Esau’s corruptions and cutting out & moving sections through which
important key phrases may (must) have been lost ;
therefore sadly it is impossible to restore the entire theme (-and her chapters) ,
and we need to see how far we come with subsequent sections ;
the prophecy seems to contain these aspects :
— ‘the attribute that the 70 bear’ (and a possible ‘70,000’) :
[Num.11:17 and mirror in Ex.18]
so not “the many people were a burden for Moses to have to bear”
but the used word ‘burden’ also is ‘tribute’ and interpreted here as ‘attribute’ ;
neither was Moses “alone (in bearing it)” ,
but “the 70 sons would not be the only ones” because the final remnant in
the days of the end would be vastly expanded — where the context of one
section does suggest an original mentioned ‘70,000’ ;
— the ‘weeping’ and ‘slain (little ones)’ by ‘the wrath of Esau’ :
this was curious —
it mentions “the great wrath” and “slaying” together with “weeping”
[but changed by Esau in his infuriating “the people wanted to eat flesh (!)”] ;
and we just had several pages about our little ones ;
but it is difficult to formulate the reasoning of how this can be said to the 70
except if they were told that because of their commitment this awful practice
in the end time by the enemy would cease — when the final remnant would
come into being ;
but than still it is very difficult to rephrase an original reasoning ;
— the children carried in the bosom to the promised land :
as belonging to previous theme ,
for we had exactly this line in the pages about ‘the slain little ones’ ;
— the ‘two heavens’ as ‘Behemoth & Leviathan’ :
not only through the example in Exodus 24 mentioned above ,
but corrupted by Esau (in Ex.18) as “the alleged two sons of alleged Jethro”
where their names ‘Gershom & Eliezer’ disguise ‘Behemoth and Leviathan’ ,
while (in Num.11:26) he started his silly alliterations like “Eldad and Medad”
as the proto-versions of his later “Gog & Magog” type corruptions ;
— they ‘promise to keep’ + ‘the 10 homers=months (CHmr=CHdsh)‘ :
ofcourse none of them ever collected ten homers of non-existing ‘quails’ ,
as a section immediately following the above ‘Eldad & Medad’ one ,
where the “promise to keep” shows in top of Exodus 24 ,
and you see how much Esau messed with the sections to distort the theme ;
— IEUE blesses the 70 and imparts the greater remnant upon them :
where the ‘blessing’ is important because belonging to Acceptance ;
the above themes do show — as our Legal Right
sadly it’s undoable to restore the entire theme (-and the subsequent chapters)
since Esau had a field day distorting their buildup to be as difficult as possible :
8
5 wherefore we need to resort to our Legal right
[cut out] as ‘having understood the original intent of this theme’
1 like shown in the above list of mentioned aspects ;
2 though we recognize a number of key-words in his now
[deleted] randomly glued sections , he used so much “flat talk” in
7 order to connect his sections (if that makes sense to you)
[imported] that we wouldn’t do you & us a favor by trying to restore it
therefore , SECTIONS :
[N is for Numbers 11 and E for Exodus 18 :]
probable start :
N16
[mirror Ex.24:1]
“And the LORD said unto Moses, Gather unto me seventy men of the elders of Israel,
whom thou knowest to be the elders of the people, and officers over them;
and bring them unto the tabernacle of the congregation, that they may stand there with thee.”
16
and – IEUE – says – unto – Moses : [< usual opening]
b
gather – unto me – seventy – men=sons of – the from=ten elders=tribes of – Ishral ,
c
whom – you know – [=to be] – elders=righteous (‘sincere’) (zqn=tsdq) – the·people = towards me
d
[=as] the officers=remnant (?) (SHoteR=SHaRith) of the them=people (‘because this is the theme’?) ;
e
and you take >> them – to – the tent=foot (?) of – the appointment=mountain , [Ex.24:4]
f
and they station themselves – [in] you=their with=camp (?) – there ; [‘for 9 weeks’ (?)]
N17
“And I will come down and talk with thee there: and I will take of the spirit which [is] upon thee,
and will put [it] upon them; and they shall bear the burden of the people with thee,
that thou bear [it] not thyself alone.
17
and I (will) come down – and speak – with you – [on] the there=mount ,
b
and I (will) reserve (‘impart’?) – from=upon [+them] + [< see later line]
c
the·spirit (!) = the (greater-) remnant (RuAch=shARth) – which (will be) – upon [=them] , [see note]
d
[=for] – you=these with=sons – (will) bear – the attribute (‘burden’) of – the·people = that remnant ,
e
[=because] you=they (will) – not – bear=be – [..] – the only ones ;
here ,
a) the word ‘burden’ also shows as ‘tribute’ , and with some flexing as “attribute” (?) ;
b) the line below has “the impartation resting upon them” ;
[next : Esau starts his cursed “the people want to eat flesh” theme]
—————-
Esau’s wrath against our little ones
[to prevent our remnant & their discovering the base 10 theme]
[see previous pages]
N10
“Then Moses heard the people weep throughout their families, every man in the door of his tent:
and the anger of the LORD was kindled greatly; Moses also was displeased.”
10
and – [in] moses=heaven – (will be) heared – the weeping of – the people=little ones , [attested]
b
……………..
c
[=for] – the anger (‘wrath’) of – ieue=Esau – (will be) burning – furiously ,
d
and [+he] (will) eyes=do – evil (‘moved’) – [to] the moses=little ones ;
here ,
Esau starts this killing after Adam informs him that the remnant will rise (see other page) ,
where the “burning furiously” was used for Esau and NOT for God ;
at the start of this (Num.11) chapter it also has “a ceasing of the fury”
which may have been “God stopping Esau’s fury when we find the themes” ;
——————-
the sons find base 10 [-and other themes]
[next : 2 shadowy figures in Esau’s story ,
and see the other examples in intro :]
N26
and they (‘sons’) (will) remain=perceive – the two – men=sides of – camp=heaven ,
b
the name of – the ones – [as] eldad=Behemoth , [or ‘the heaven as the dragon Behemoth’ etc]
c
and the name of – the other one – [as] medad=Leviathan ,
d
and (that) – the spirit=covenant (ruch=brith) – rests – on them (‘connected to them’?), [see line below]
e
[……….. ? ……….] ;
[continued :]
E20
and [=they] (will) warn=understand – [in] [=him] (‘scroll’) [ section of 2 lines : ]
b
the ordinance – [=as] the law=command – [=that] [=I] know=gave – to them – […………….? ……………]
c
[=as] the (eden-) deed=year (mosh=shna) – which – they (should) do=keep (osh=shmr) ;
E21
………….. of 10 – chiefs=months (shr=chdsh) ;
here ,
in truth ‘the lines containing numbers’ can be anything (-concerning base 10)
but weird examples like the ’10 homer’ almost certainly was about this , see intro ;
yet after ‘the year’ (in 20) SHOULD follow ’10 months’ here ,
but ofcourse Esau massively overdid his deflection here
E23
[and] if=because – [=they] (will have) do=understood +
b
this – matter (‘base 10’) [=which] – [+their] deity – commanded [=them] , […………….. ? …………….] ; +
next : the 70,000 come into being :
N21
[=therefore] [=I] (will) say=establish – the moses=remnant (mSHe=SHrth) [2 lines : ]
b
[as] six=seventy – […] – thousand – footmen=sons – [and] people=daughters
c
whom – [+I] (will) within=add (to) [=them] (‘sons’ as you & we) ,
d
[=as] you=all – (that will have) say=died (amrth=mth) – [to] [+their] flesh – […………?…………] ;
here ,
a) anyway this was a non-sensible line with a non-sensible ‘600,000’ ;
and see how the ‘70,000’ must also appear in the line , below ;
b) the “died to their flesh” may be valid ,
if we consider “the angel of IEUE … that will bear your transgression”
as posed in the intro above , introducing that ‘second phase’ ;
but you see how difficult it is to re-formulate a proper reasoning here
N22
the=and flock=no – and=longer – (will) the herd=little ones (?) – (be) killed – [……….?…………]
b
[=but] – all of – the fishes=remnant – (with) the sea=little ones – (will be) gathered – […………?…………] ;
[next : we had this line :]
N12
……….. [and] [the daughters] – (will) carry him=the little girls – in [=their] bosom
b
[=and] the which=sons – (will) carry – the (boy-) infants – [=upon] [+their] [=shoulder]
c
[=when] [+they will come] – [to] the ground (‘Eden’) – which – I gave – to [=your] fathers ;
here ,
line 11-12 could read as the things that the daughter of tsiun will say ,
upon seeing the remnant she says “who are these ? because I was bereaved from children” ,
and compare the buildup in 11 unto 12 ;
but perhaps it’s too complex to introduce her at this point ?
———————————-
Moses is to tell this to the 70 waiting sons : [3 lines :]
N23
[=then] – IEUE – says – to – Moses : the hand=zeal (?) of – IEUE – (will) short=accomplish (this) ;
b
now – see=go – ?=and happen=tell – my words – or=to – the not=leaders ;
N24
and – Moses – goes forth – and speaks – the words of – IEUE – to – the people=leaders ,
b
and – the seventy – men=sons – from the old=ten – people=tribes – gather=receive (?) [+them] (‘words’) ,
c
and [=they] stand=confess (?) – them – around=before – tent=IEUE ;
N25
[=then] – IEUE – comes down – in a cloud – to speak=bless (dbr=bkr) – [..] [=them] ,
b
[=as] reserving (?) (‘imparting’?) – from=all of – the spirit=remnant – which – (will be) [=by] them ,
c
[=that] (will) give=become (to be) – the seventy [+thousand] – men=sons – from the old=ten – [=tribes] ;
d
[=so that] it (will) come to pass – [=that] – the spirit=remnant – (will) rest – upon them [as ‘blueprint-70’]
e
[=as] the prophecy (‘noun now’) – (that) they (‘remnant’) (will be) added – [unto-] not=them (‘the 70’) ;
here ,
it had no sense to again mention ‘the 70’ so that now ‘70,000’ must have been intended ;
conclusion
… you see how we can only gather fragments of the original prophecy ,
yet we think we gathered enough to can reconstruct the original intended theme ,
because the ’70 days’ theme seems to have been deliberately connected with the
start of the proto-remnant as the 70 sons of old-Ishral ;
now , it will be difficult to confirm this theme elsewhere ,
also because the number ’70’ seems to be erased several times in the scroll ,
and where it does appear , like the alleged “seventy disciples” in Luke chapter 10 ,
the context there is so utterly corrupted that not even key words remained for us
to can reconstruct a credible restoration from ,
wherewith — sadly — we but have the above chapters to derive our Legal right from
———————————————
you forgive us please Majesty
for we will arrive to you completely broke and empty
having given all we had
as you asked
so that our only hope is that you are powerful
and kind
and full of love