[theme]  : the 70th day + “the 40th day as “the feast of Trumpets” (?) :
                  – the rite of Tammuz (‘Adam’!) in the fifth month as death & rebirth
                  – and ‘the dream of Dumizi’ (‘Adam’) of his death [-explained by Eve] 
                      with the destruction of his region of stolen Eden-constructs (!)
                      may point to a 40th day Trumpets [-and not at the 1st of the 7th month] 

                                                                      [2026-08aug.9-10] 

           
[please do see previous intro page] 
[added : theme starts to look good]
 

 

…  we’re trying to establish what can have been
the intended original day of the feast of Trumpets :
was it indeed the rather illogical ‘first of the seventh’
or was its original date ’40 days after Acceptance’
so that her theme would usher into the judgment 
represented by “the day of the (great-) Trumpet” ..?                                                                                                        
this is a Legal Case please ,
and the ‘dream’ is our most important proof :
if the entire demon-realm knew that it could happen
how “evil men could be on a quest to him” resulting
in “Dumizi’s death by powerful spirits” [Heaven]  ,
could moving the day of Trumpets prevent that ?
Dumuzi

 
we fought SO hard for ‘the 70th day’ :
could this theme be its extension that we missed..?

 

                                                                                            theme

 

     why Dumuzid can be ‘Adam’ (can be ‘a biblical theme’)
     since we’re careful to practice unfounded syncretism    —
     like in the Scroll the sons of Esau work together with the sons of the serpent race
     and the same is reflected in the Egyptian Spells, it’s defendable how the Sumerian
     culture that was serpent-based , apart from celebrating their victory over the Eden
     realm in the form of slain Tiamat , can have mentioned “the ex Eden deity” also
     (since he now worked for them !) , allowing this figure to be a “lower rank divinity”
     in their pantheon , who was worshipped in several localities but not nationwide
 
     please keep in mind that ‘Adam’ must have manifested himself over time 
     and a good example of that is “to Ptolemy II” who started the enterprise of the 
     corruption of the Scroll (-see page) , and probably also “to Alexander the Great” ;
     while if we would make a search into this theme also other types would appear
 
     how the serpent race speaks about him
     … the best example is Rgveda , also written by serpent-race members ,
     saying “he makes everything we desire for us, so praise him with harp and flute” 
     [book X]  but they almost mistrust “the stranger” or at least are careful about him ;
     they also know about his partner woman “who constantly calls him to come to her” 
     and also about his sons (but the Ammon-Esau sons here) now as the Kavi-priests
     who oversee the awful ritual of slaying our Originals and command their matrix ,
     saying of them “for a short time they had wandered-astray (read : Eden origins)
     but ever since , they are working together with us”    —
     and this color about ‘Adam’ also applies to his alter ego ‘Dumuzid’ (Tammuz)
 

                                                                           ATTRIBUTES
 
     his name breaks down into (dumu) “son” or “child” and (zid) “true , faithful , right” 
     as “the true son” or “faithful son” — but in the context of being an ex-Eden figure ;
     and ,
        “he was associated with agriculture and shepherds, also being the first and primary consort 
         of the goddess Inanna (later known as Ishtar). In Sumerian mythology, Dumuzid’s sister was
         Geshtinanna, the goddess of agriculture, fertility, and dream interpretation. In the Sumerian
         King List, Dumuzid is listed as an antediluvian [pre-flood]  king of the city of Bad-tibira 
         and also an early king of the city of Uruk.” 

     here ,
     the type attributes (‘agriculture and shepherds’ here) 
     were in the first place “aspects in the other Reality” 
     that became translated into the earthly situation ;
     like
         “As Dumuzid-sipad (“the Shepherd”), Dumuzid was
          believed to be the provider of milk which was a rare, 
          seasonal commodity in ancient Sumer due to the fact 
          that it could not easily be stored withoutspoiling.” ,
     because the ‘spoiling’ may be true ,
     but “milk” is “a type (stolen matrix-) dimensional-quality”
     used like that both in the Egyptian Spells as in Rgveda
Dumuzi

 
 
     his ‘sister’ Geshtinanna : Eve (-and see below)                                                                                                [#1] 
     … though the Wiki page is extensive her main attribute is vague ;
     snippets :
         “It is not certain what functions she fulfilled in the Mesopotamian pantheon, though her 
          association with the scribal arts and dream interpretation is well attested. She could serve 
          as a scribe in the underworld, where according to the myth ‘Inanna’s Descent’ she had to 
          reside for a half of each year in place of her brother [we’ll get to that]  .” 
     and this is interesting ,
         “In later sources, the form “Geshtinanna” was the most commonly used one, and it might 
          have developed due to the prefix ama (Sumerian : “mother”) being considered an epithet.
          It has been argued that she was imagined as older than [Dumuzi]  , since she could be 
          referred to with epithets such as ama (“mother”) and umma (“old woman” or “wise woman”).
          [..]  The conventional translation of the standard form of the name is “grapevine of heaven”, 
          though the word geštin can have had the metaphorical meaning “sweet” or “lovely”.
    [here ,
    the “lovely” and the “an-na / na-na” aspects will return, below] 
    but ‘sister’ means here “a wife – of the same stock” opposed to the serpent race ,
    who the same time is “the mother” as being “the first óf that stock” as the same 
    reason why Eve was called “mother” and who indeed was ‘lovely’ to behold 
    [while the ‘wisdom’ is the (ex-) Eden-type sweet “female intuition”]  ;
    now please ,
    it cannot be coincidence that Abraham was called out from that culture ,                                     <<<
    and because God explained unto him everything concerning the other Reality , 
    Abraham’s “going to Pharaoh pretending that his woman Sarah was his sister” 
    must have represented this theme — so that the real intended subject was ‘Adam’                [sic] 
    (because it’s all that much corrupted) OR that indeed Abraham had to execute this 
    after which ‘a prophecy followed explaining what Adam had done’
    (because the same sister-wife event is repeated but with a different ruler) ;
    where of course God wanted the history to be clear to you & we

    Dumuzi’s Dream                                                                                                                                                        [Legal :] 
    and quite prophetical though naturally not every detail is true ,
    where it may directly relate to the “+40 day Trumpets” theme we look for now ,                        
    as

In Dumuzi’s Dream, Geshtinanna interprets the eponymous dream and informs Dumuzi that  it foretells his death [so, the death of Adam !]  . She refers to the assailants as bandits [we !]  ,   indicating that in this composition belonged to the tradition in which Dumuzi’s death was  caused by an attack of evil men rather than any events
pertaining to Inanna 

[that is true because not the matrix will be causing his death]  .
However, Geshtinanna also identifies the attackers as ‘galla’. It is possible she uses the term  in its historical, rather than mythical, sense, supported by the description of the assailants as  inhabitants of specific Mesopotamian cities, though it is also possible that a secondary source   used by the compiler belonged to a tradition involving demons of the underworld
[probably “because it is a combination of both”]  . The historical galla were most likely officials of the judiciary, possibly analogous to policemen, but in literary texts they can be described as bandits and finally ‘as demons’ . 
While Dumuzi is in hiding [sic]  , Geshtinanna and her adviser Geshtindudu wait for the galla to arrive to warn him. Later the galla try to bribe her to offer them information about Dumuzi’s whereabouts, but she refuses. They leave her alone and instead approach Dumuzi’s unnamed  friend instead. While with the help of Utu and Belili Dumuzi manages to escape them for a time,  they eventually catch him when he returns to Geshtinanna’s sheepfold.” 

 
you & we are “literal men on earth” but helped by Heaven that eventually itsélf will 
enter the matrix to destroy it — and a very similar concept shows in the translation
(here) where “enemies are searching for Dumuzi (for that’s exactly what we do !) ,
and they are virtually ‘literal men’ :

“[110-138]  Those who came for the king [Dumuzi]  are a motley crew, who know not food,   who know not drink, who eat no sprinkled flour, who drink no poured water, who accept no  pleasant gifts, who do not enjoy a wife’s embraces, who never kiss dear little children,  who never chew sharp-tasting garlic, who eat no fish, who eat no leeks.  [all above probably means “men of a different nature”] 
 There were two men of Adab who came for the king. They were thistles in dried-up waters,  they were thorns in stinking waters [……]  , two men of Akcak who came for the king, with … carried on their shoulders. Then there were two men of Unug who came for the king. With head-smashing clubs tied to their waists, there were two men of Urim [..etc…] .” ,

here ,
the constant repeats are annoying to read but such was their style ,
and the many ‘city-names’ must underline “that these are from earth” 
even though the color already has a spiritual component ,
while the ‘two’ may implicate (a foreshadowing of-) the house Ishral and Judah ;
 
at the closing indeed “the major demons” have located him ,
and interestingly the region of stolen Eden-concepts shows where ‘the staff’                               [sic] 
is the stolen scepter-axis , the churn is “the cave (with stolen crystal-floor)” etc ,
[from 245]       

“(The demons said:) “Unless Jectin-ana [Eve]  is aware of Dumuzid’s whereabouts,  she is indeed looking frightened! She is indeed screaming in a frightened way! Come, let us    go to the sheepfold and cow-pen!” [matrix-Torus and Orion region] . When the first demon entered the sheepfold and cow-pen, he set fire to the bolt [sic ! door-bolt of the Gate !]  .  When the second entered the sheepfold and cow-pen, he set fire to the shepherd’s stick [stolen axis] . When the third entered the sheepfold and cow-pen, he removed the cover of  the holy churn [probably ‘the murky cave’]  . When the fourth entered the sheepfold and cow-pen, he tore down the drinking cup from the peg where it hung [probably their mixing-vessels wherein the stolen fire is mingled ; see Akitu pages]  . When the fifth entered the sheepfold  and cow-pen, the churns lay on their side, no milk was poured, the drinking cups lay on their side, Dumuzid was dead, the sheepfold was haunted. 
(Instead of lines 256-260, 1 ms. has: When the fourth entered the sheepfold and cow-pen,  he poured water on my holy brazier. When the fifth demon entered the sheepfold and cow-pen, he tore down my holy drinking cup from the peg where it hung. When the sixth demon   entered the sheepfold and cow-pen, the churns lay on their side, and no milk was poured.  When the seventh demon entered the sheepfold and cow-pen, the drinking cups lay on their side, Dumuzid was dead, the sheepfold was haunted.)” 

here ,
note how it are ‘7’ demons — because of base 7 that he sold !
while the ‘door-bolt’ theme we just had in the book of Gates hour #1 recently ;
the matrix always knew that they cóuld lose — however small the chance —
and perhaps this was written down as a constant reminder , who knows ,
but they were surely aware of the way that events to a defeat would ensue !
add to this Rgveda telling “how Yami [Eve]  muttering to herself how much she needs a son” 
(alternatively ‘she and Yama’ Adam) , then both men in this dream should be “both houses” !
it’s bizarre to realize that the entire demon-world knew ,
and also knew about the situation of “Adam having imprisoned Eve in a solitary place” 
and that their relation was not healthy — to say the least ,
for in ‘Dumuzid and Ghestinanna’ (here) she says to him ,
[33-46]  
       “O my brother, shepherd […] , lad who has not fulfilled those days and years ! O my brother, 
        lad who has no wife , who has no children ! O my brother, lad who has no friend, 
        who has no companion! O my brother, the lad who is not a comfort (?) to his mother!”
 

please — of interest for us is ‘the relation with [the day of-]  Trumpets’ here ,                 [CORE] 
    as a day of judgement that they certainly want to prevent ,
    and we’re seeking to establish that the original day of Trumpets followed 40 days
    after the day of Acceptance , so that Trumpets fell at the start of the fifth month ,
    while the Mesopotamian rite of “mourning for Tammuz” [Dumuzi]  also fell in that
    time frame : in fact ‘the fifth month’ was named ‘Tammuz’ !
    how much is the chance that Esau moved the Trumpets date to an illogical date
    like ‘the first of the seventh month’ in order to disarm this theme (-of it)….?
 
    could “moving a sacred feast” derive it from its Legal power ..?
    our instinct says ‘yes’ but we don’t want to make a mistake in this towards Him ,
    and though the above is the best lead until now that it probably was moved ,
    we’re scrambling to find additional aspects …

tammuz

                                                                                            II
 

    the yearly ‘death and rebirth’ of Tammuz
    … which a bit later was followed by ancient Egypt 
    in their Osiris-reborn when the star Sirius showed
    also around the time of midsummer ,
    yet that theme was not specifically about “Adam”
    [to right ; Tammuz with his dog ,
    and though outwardly ‘a shepherd’ needs ‘a dog’ 
    there is something else going on here : not only is
    a dog mentioned in the poem above but also the 
    Rgveda describes “the dog of Yama” (Adam) but 
    like a monstrous black one having “four eyes”   —
    we don’t know yet what that could be about]  
Dumizi

 

“In addition to being the god of shepherds, Dumuzid was also an agricultural deity associated  with the growth of plants. Ancient Near Eastern people associated Dumuzid with the springtime when the land was fertile and abundant, but, during the summer months, when the land was  dry and barren, it was thought that Dumuzid had “died”. During the month of Dumuzid, which  fell in the middle of summer [the 5th month later called ‘Tammuz’]  , people all across Sumer would mourn over his death. This seems to have been the primary aspect of his cult. In Lagash, the month of Dumuzid was the sixth month of the year. A ritual associated with the Ekur temple in Nippur equates Dumuzid
with the snake-god Istaran

[see below]  who in that ritual, is described as having died.” 

 
    it’s difficult to get more information about this rite — and probably because there
    simply was not much more to it but the core shown above — while we know from
    the Akitu-pages that this ‘mourning’ constituted of deliberate crocodile-tears
    since at least the ruling elite (or read “those city-state rulers which had adopted 
    Adam as their deity”) knew very well that deep down it all signified a Ritual here ,
    indeed “of keeping the matrix-seasons on this earth alive” but beneath that with
    the theme “to keep Adam alive” where of course his ‘ritual death’ would prevent
    that he would literally die ,
    in spite of texts as ,

“there is wailing..[Tammuz] …has been taken away, …the wailing is for the plants, they grow not …the wailing is for the great river, it brings the flood no more.  The wailing is for the fishponds..”

 
    question is what we do with the lines in Ezekiel 8 ,
         (14-15)

“Then he brought me to the door of the gate of the LORD’S house which [was]  toward the north;  and, behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz.  Then said he unto me, Hast thou seen [this] , O son of man ? turn thee yet again, [and]  thou shalt see greater abominations than these.” ;

    in this chapter ,
    because of the term ‘abomination’ is used for “the matrix base 12 month year”
    we need those roots but its very corrupted ; but the ‘image’ usually is ‘of the sky’ 
    and “the idols portrayed round about” [in 10]  máy be “the Zodiac” ;                                                <<<
    consequently ,
    in [11]  are no ’70 men of the house of Ishral’ but “10 months of the house of Eden”
    rendering [14]  “women – weeping – the·Tammuz (!)” invalid , but it’s difficult to
    see what it can have been also since the line is so short ; 
    yet it DOES show that Esau saw it related to this very theme here !
    wherefore [16]  was ‘[the (matrix-) year of-]  20=2 and 5=10 men=months’ so that
    God’s people on earth ‘will worship the (matrix-) east=image of sun=heaven’ 
    like in the Revelation chapter of the alleged ‘666’ 
    (we’d need to review a lot of chapters with this base-10 tool now …)   
 
   Ishtaran (‘Adam’) — and the sexy goddess Nanaya (Eve)                                                                            [#2] 

    where this ‘Ishtaran’ is a version of Dumizi , see earlier ,
    but where the latter is depicted as rather ‘impotent’ here the 
    deity is associated with more powerful aspects 
    [and who knows ‘instigated by Adam himself’ as some PR ?] 
    because suddenly the attributes become rather positive 
    and he is even linked to the MUSHUSSU-serpents           >>
    that were the pet-animals of Marduk and represented the 
    purified fires of the imprisoned crystal-floor (-Akitu pages) ;
Ishtaran

 

“It is known that he was a divine judge, and his position in the Mesopotamian pantheon was  most likely high, but much about his character remains uncertain.  According to Wilfred G. Lambert, Ištaran’s face was regarded as beautiful [sic]  , and a lament refers to him as ‘bright-eyed’. He was also associated with snakes [see above] . It’s also possible  that depictions of snakes on kudurru (boundary stones) represented Ištaran as a judge deity resolving conflicts over land. 
[…..]  In a single text, he and Dumuzi are outright equated with each other. Irene Sibbing-Plantholt argues he could also be associated with healing, for she notes that in  a text from Malgium the theophoric name Ištarān-asû occurs, asû being a term translated either  as “physician” or more broadly “healer” [because ‘he makes everything for them’ , see above]  .

 
    to be fair there’s more to him in the texts but we’d need to look for the texts
    (which we cannot read – yet) so this is all we can pour out of it thus far ;
    saying this because interesting is one line appearing to refer to the region
    just above the opened Eden gate as mentioned above ,
    in phrases as in one of the Temply Hymns , where he is referred to as
        “lugal dubur anna, “lord of the base of heaven”
   

Nanaya [Eve]   
Nanaya was a Mesopotamian goddess of love closely associated   with Inanna, and her cult was centered in Uruk rather than in the   periphery [perhaps Abraham came ‘from Uruk’ in the Ur-period ?] 
While she is well attested in Mesopotamian textual sources from  many periods from the times of the Third Dynasty of Ur to the Fall  of Babylon and beyond, she was among the most commonly- worshipped goddesses through much of Mesopotamian history, though both her origin and the meaning of her name are unknown.
[……]  Her primary role was that of a goddess of love, and she was  associated with eroticism and sensuality, though she was also a patron of lovers , including rejected or betrayed ones 
Tammuz  Nanaya on a throne
[sic – that makes Sense since she was, by Adam]  .
[…..]  An artificial Sumerian etymology was created for the name in late Babylonian texts, deriving it  from NA, “to call,” with a feminine suffix, A. A possible translation of this ancient scholarly explanation  is “the one who keeps calling” [she did, see earlier]  or “the calling one”.
 [She]  was referred to as bēlet ruʾāmi, “lady of love”, and the physical aspect of love was particularly strongly associated with her, and texts dedicated to her could be explicit. For example, a cultic song describes her in the following terms: “When you lean the side against the wall, your nakedness is sweet, when [you]  bow down, the hips are sweet [……]  , [which] in the majority of royal inscriptions about her and in many other documents, was described with the Sumerian word ḫili and its Akkadian equivalent kubzu, which can be translated as charmluxuriance, voluptuousness or sensuality.

 

though the Sumerians could be very explicit – because serpent race – 
and produce repulsive erotic statues and texts , we don’t believe it was the case here ,
for the descriptions remind more of “the beauty standard” (usually in the man’s mind)
which was worshipped here ; 
there exists a black granite statue of an Egyptian Pharaoh flanked by a female who 
cannot be ‘his wife’ for she lacks the attributes , but the girl is hewn so very delicate
and pretty that she is absolutely lovely to see (-but sadly we can’t trace back that pic) ,
wherefore we think “that this Pharaoh chose the lady — Eve — as his patron goddess”
akin to the later Medieval age wherein knights chose their Lady ,
and that same concept must have happened here 
 
not that Eve would ever have shown herself to them , of course ,
but we saw they knew much about other Reality and must have seen her or otherwise
her beautiful daughters in the form of our beautiful but imprisoned female Originals , 
so that they were not worshipping ‘her’ but “the physical beauty she represented” 
and probably that is also why her cult lasted so long   
 
Nanaya in the book 2Maccabees (!)
surprisingly – or probably not really – is that she appears in Esau’s fiction ‘Maccabees’ :
he wrote the silly epos to defend his father (!) Adam and the Strange Fire he placed ,
represented by the invented “desecration of the Temple by the mortal enemy” 
where a substantial aspect of this Ritual was ‘to disarm our dangerous feast days’ 
(so that both themes are linked to this one) ;
in a chapter he has the enemy ‘Antiochus’ go to Persia to the temple of Nanaya ,
but her priests that protect her set a trap for him and slay him while he’s in the temple :
this story is só superfluous that you can feel how Esau still wanted to hint to the real
subject he so tried to cover up — where indeed ‘the priests’ are ‘you & we’ , and the 
goddess is ‘Eve’ while “the murdered ruler” is ‘Adam’ 

 

                                                                          CONCLUSION
 
       – apart from the main themes that very much support our case ,
         we need to know “whether Adam invented the hot summer thing” as a means to
         have the Ritual take place at midsummer (read : the 40th day) but drag the result
         away into the Fall (-and consequently the Spring) ,
         and if that was the blueprint for Esau having put (?) Trumpets in ‘the Fall’ 
         in order to Disarm it by now being at the wrong position :
         our problem of course is “that we have no way of a priori verifying this possibility” 
         since we can only be sure (of things) after they will have happened ,
         but hence this Legal Case claims the probability for it — and we just need to see
 
         added :
 
       – the “erotic” type texts (see Dumuzid Wiki page for an example) 
            are of the same kind we saw in Rgveda : as a concealed way of explaining the 
            region of the opened Eden-gate and the stolen constructs there ,
            where here ‘the attribute of Inanna’ (Torus rule) talks to that of Dumuzid in
                     my vulva (‘gate region’) , the horn [+of] the Boat of Heaven (‘Torus’) 
                      who will plow my wet ground ?
                     [etc. , then follows ‘milk’ as dimensional aspect]
       – having skipped the story of “the descent of Inanna” ,
           as ‘she’ the man-woman descending 7 gates into the underworld to gain a form
           of base-7 and linked to Dumizi : 
           it seems a rare elaborate hoax to cover up the base-7 given to them by Adam 
           and we don’t put it past him that he popularized this story in Sumerian culture
           for the buildup and attributes make very little Sense ;
       – ignored :
           the alleged “closeness of Nanaya with Inanna (Ishtar)” for that’s a drag (pun) :
            the matrix appears to have copied “the attribute as function of (Eden-) female”  
           in the form of ‘Inanna’ (or ‘Ishtar’ , and as the Egyptian Isis) ,
           but as (corrupt-) Dualistic masculine ‘female’ where in the Spells she is the
           figure “Isis with phallus” and in Sumer “Inanna with the beard” ,
           and we really don’t even want to waste time with those pathetic matrix copies
 

 

for you our Majesty
forgive us all please
we fight so hard