content : … at first the idea that He did not command it may sound ridiculous – but only because we are so used to the idea while anyway today’s Christianity does not practice it anymore ; however , the evil intent of ‘circumcision’ remains valid as Esau’s rather nasty ritual of ancient Egypt supporting the stealing of God’s sacred fire  as the bas-reliefs in this page will show     — unless you & we are Undoing that ritual now :

taken from a bas-relief

for it was devised specifically against the birthright of us 144,000
while changing the sign on the forehead into that ‘of the phallus’
represented as ‘(birth-) sceptre’ — but the Dark ritual is decoded
and the Isaiah section shown at the closing is very positive for us
 
 
 
                                                                                         theme
 
… that this specific theme came into view is because of still searching our ‘+40 days’
from Aaron’s sanctification (-page) in which “seven days and on the·eighth” show
that hopefully was “40 days and on the 40th (or ‘Atonement)” , and as a phrase that
several returns élsewhere , sometimes in the same context — but usually corrupted ;
Lev.12 has a “seven days and on the·eighth he will be circumcised” yet the act
is nowhere expláined , while it is a similar “sanctification theme” and even suggests
a “total time of 40” by adding ’33 days to 7′ !
now please ,
we can go look at the text — but probably only “the 40 day possibility” will remain —
but a further investigation of the circumcision theme itself was needed because the
whole action lost its base IF it was a corrupted “Aaron sanctified theme” ;
to be fair , neither we gave it much attention because of the reasoning “the phallus
concept is not out of God : so He gave that command to mutilate that concept as a
token , as an indication that not He made this body”  —
yet now the nagging question came ‘then why would He go link himself to it ?’ 
 
IF it was such an important command why it was only done to a handful of men ?
why do terms as “circumcise” and “foreskin” very irregularly (!) show up in the first
five books but then completely have faded out in prophets (sic) ?
why only one “law of circumcision chapter” if it was so important to keep it ?
what about the Lev.19 line“you shall not make cuttings (!) in your flesh”?
wherefore ,
how much is the chance that , since Esau covered up so much of the real Eden
covenant in the Abraham & Jacob chapters , he added ‘circumcision’ instead ?
 
worrying : as a practice in Egypt
… that several (old-) cultures around the globe practiced it is one thing ,
but suspicious as we are about anything related to Esau it needed a closer look —
only to find that only a handful of bas-reliefs and their text about it have survived
(or was that perhaps ‘on purpose’ ?) even though it was a fairly important ritual  ;
until finally this came along :

bas-relief of a circumcision scene (temple of Amenhotep in Luxor)

found fragments of other similar circumcision scenes show a
similar setting : a woman sitting behind a boy and holding his
groin with her hand , where a priest in front of him performs
the act of circumcision upon the boy (where in one instance
it looks as if the knife of the priest has a 40 cm long handle)
while (probably) some deities stand around ;
but usually no text survived that would explain the scene ;
here ,
a similar scene but more extensive , showing the goddess
Seshat holding an ânkh standing to their right while maybe
pointing with a staff to the boys that are looking up at her ;
while this can be the reconstuction of this damaged scene :

the reconstruction seems true and would explain the ’40cm handle’ as the tip of Seshat’s staff touching the manhood of the one boy ; yet here ‘the circumcision’ links to the other reality ! not only that but the deity Seshat – a concept in the mystery-Babylon paradise has a heinous task in their stealing of Eden aspects ,,

Seshat , the inversed seven-fold concept …. so that we know who is in play here   — its name as “the 7-fold (one) as the inversed one” where the subject is ‘something stolen from Eden’ while she as goddess depicts ‘a serving concept’ ; the bird-cage on the staff she holds is the glyph H’EB “the (completed) solar plane (B)” as all of the region of mystery-Babylon north of Eden ; then , the ‘stick with 7 leaves’ on her head is red Flag since “7” is the typical number of God , where glyph (KHSF) ‘7’ also means “to untie” also with the subject “.. something from Eden” ;

elsewhere is posted the mural showing ‘Thoth’ who is “the male aspect óf Seshat”
standing before an altar and commanding seven flames coming out of it where his
pose reminds of someone doing sorcery” ,
so that Seshat links to “fire” but perhaps better said “as the inversed flow óf fire” ;
and considering all these aspects ,
the real subject here can only be ‘the fire upon the altar of God’s sanctuary’ !
 
text shown at ‘Seshat’  
sections only for it’s not worth doing all   —
“(matrix-) existence by the evil one (“eden fire”) for the multitude (of demons)
of the completed solarplane” ,                            (=so it’s a rather major attribute !) ,
“forever ascending to Râ” ,                           (=the by her directed stolen fire does) ,
“so that the (matrix) light will stand upright (in their dimension) as the devised
ones (flames) for above (in the north as their region) ,
“the beautiful ones (now her flames) as the hidden ones to guard” ,
and “to be all of the (matrix-) house through the lady Seshat” ;
 
[Scroll reminder about this theme , for context :]  
we know that when Eden had fallen Adam helped to build mystery-Babylon ,
and thén already they stole the fire from God’s altar to power their matrix-region
and especially their (=this) sun Râ — hence the reason ‘it will go dark’ soon —
wherefore Seshat represents this theme ;
Adam was obsessed by ‘getting back at God’ : first he vowed a 7-fold revenge
(sic !) on Eden but even built his own gate – as poor copy of God’s – for Babylon
[hence Adam’s gate is “the image of jealousy” in Ez.]   ,
but together with the fire he also stole “the seven Torches” that maintained the
Eden land — and probably powered by the (7-fold) fire of God’s altar — so that
the Scroll now describes them “as the females trembling for the abusive enemy” ;
only much later ,
Adam himself placed his ‘strange fire’ upon the altar of God, not only to secure
the stealing of the fire that already was going on but also other themes :
was this “circumcision curiosity” still a hidden part óf the ‘strange fire’ theme … ?
 
now that we know all the aspects involved in this bas-relief ,
let’s see what the shown depiction is about :
 

but what is the Seshat – ‘circumcision’ link ? … to right : the fact that ‘foreskins’ appéars in the dictionary (and in two variants) is already telling , is it not ? Budge added ‘compare hebrew -orleh’ and when you say both words after eachother they indeed feel to have some cadence so that (Egyptian !) Esau can have invented the “hebrew version” ; it’s a difficult glyph but shows ‘staff’ (TÁ) which immediately reminds of Seshat’s staff !

 
the Egyptians were obsessed with their own ‘phallus concept’ also as ‘weapon’ ,
and many Spells are about “their dimensional axis as phallus invading Eden” ,
compare that ‘like being a highway for the transport of stolen (eden-) goods’ ;
so that the first problem here is ,
WHY would they go mutilate their own so beloved concept ?
for that makes absolutely No Sense — except if it was ‘a sacrificial ritual’ ! 
 
interestingly , two boys are shown yet it is the same boy :
the one on this earth ‘that is circumcised’ and his future-self that will dwell in
the Field of Reeds as the paradise of mystery-Babylon : above the head of his
future-self stands the glyph ‘the Double’ (KA) as the one boy that is not being
circumcised in this scene !
it looks like “some great promise becáuse of a sacrifice” is the theme here ,
so that after his death and entrance in that Field he will be greatly honoured  —
and still recognizable (above both deities) is ,
 all / the prosperity / thou / existence / existence / to give , 
as a phrase also used in the Spells about ‘stealing from Eden’ ,
where the one’s existence is giving (the object) to the other one’s existence ;
where here the boy gives prosperity tó the Field – by him being circumcised !
 
because in the column to right is readable ,
ânkh-life / (of?) years / (by) the (stolen !) light / (for) the millions (of demons) / 
(by means of) (eden-) existence / (to) (matrix-) existence / to give ,
said here about Seshat and the intended subject is “the eden-light” ,
and you see how this line corresponds (c.q juxtaposes) with the similar line
that is said about that son — so that there is some cooperation going on here :
the son does something – a sacrifice – so that he helps Seshat in doing what
she does best : being complicit in stealing the altar fire of God !
 
the ‘millions’ here are the same as ‘the multitude’ in the previous Seshat pic
so the context is good because the same , but of other glyphs the subject is
unclear so that in the visible phrase “(matrix-) existence becoming new”
and “the seven – jaws” (into Eden) the intended context of the line is lost ;
however ,
in the left column shows something about the promised “boy’s future-self” ,
(to be) he / the adam-like (matrix) rule / (of) his (boy) / divine Double ,
as the promise for the incredible suffering he had to endure [/sarc]   through
his ‘gift’ as the circumcision-mutilation of their virtually most sacred object
 
wherewith we please declare this whole scene ‘decoded’      —
 
                                                                               conclusion
a Great evil
… would it be too much imagining Esau shrieking of pleasure when he saw
how he could replace “the sign put upon the forehead of Aaron in his time
of consecration” (see Lev.9 page) into a ‘sign’ linked to his ugly concept ,
so that millions of (Jacob-) souls of God would work against Him
by helping Esau and his evil goal by accepting that God had ordered that
law saying “thou shalt circumcise the male boy on the eighth day” … ?
        [sub :
        not to go off track but look at the story of “the sword of Damocles” —
        the origin of the story is about when Esau corrupted the scroll while
        a ‘sword’ is an axis , Dionysius is an Adam figure (-Ptolemy II page) ,
         Damocles is ‘people of glory’ (144?) that “wants to be in his place” (!) ,
        while the ‘constant threat’ can be ‘a simmering Lethal occult ritual’…] 
 
 attacking the 144
… and because he corrupted it in the context of ‘the consecration’ since he
saw how Aaron’s consecration was (but) a foreshadowing of that of the 144 ,
he effectively glued a simmering unholy aspect unto the coming 144 :
God said “I will purge the remnant (during Atonement +40 days) because
I will have a sacred remnant” ,
but how can she be with this travesty still would remain upon her ?

destroying evidence to right : another found fragment of this same theme ; since it was such a huge weapon for Esau , and because around 240 BC he started to round up any Scroll book he could find to go corrupt them (-see Ptolemy II page) , would you put it past him to hide evidence that ‘circumcision’ already was practiced in Egypt for some 2000 (!) years already , BEFORE he would introduce that (practice) as if ‘by God’ when he corrupted the Scroll during that same time of Ptolemy II ?

 
covering up ‘the Egyptian origin of it’ would not be tóo difficult since only
the priestly elite and just a handful of Pharaoh’s had been involved in it ,
so that and can explain why so little evidence has remained ;
and concerning the time frame :
the bas-relief in top of page is from the tomb of Ankhmahor of 2340 BC ,
and strange is that it shows “adult males” — however , it may be from the
time that ‘circumcision’ just had been introduced to themselves ,
also because the accompanying glyph text is short and… rather primitive ,
as (by) the circumcision (SBT) / he (client) / the pay-back / to give,
yet you recognize a similar ‘sacrificial theme’ here where the used glyph
TÉBA is ‘payback, restore, return, answer etc’
 
                                                                            two more themes :
 
[the meaning of ‘foreskin’ QARNATÁ (great but bit difficult read) :

… it centres around root QAR which is “the gate in the north” per the (poor) drawing to right : remember that God created the reálm of Eden inbetween the corrupt (masculine) Behemoth and (feminine) Leviathan one , and at their respective borders He placed ‘a gate’  — QER is about ‘the north gate’ which they need to keep open [in order to can keep stealing]  ,

for this is the same gate of which God in the Scroll asks his people on earth ,
“who you will closes the gate so that my light will not illumine (the matrix) ?’ ,
so that the circumcision drag IS about this gate & the light & the closing !
and interestingly ,
it dóes relate to “our birth-sceptre” theme since the sceptre is the eden-axis                       <<< 
(in blue here) so that it WAS important that we would uncover this ritual
 
hence them connecting ‘circumcision’ with “the phallus (as) staff” ,
so that their axis – in red – can keep invading Eden through that opened gate !
wherefore , and a bit graphic but not as our fault ,
the foreskin itself represents “the gate” for it surrounding the phallus which is
the (invading matrix-) ‘axis’ and hence that Ritual ‘keeps the gate opened‘ !
then the QAR itself :
line taken from Book of the Dead spell 180 shown in line 10 (see here) ,
 

(for) the Ba-bird-bodies / (to be) (matrix) existence / ,
(because through) the [star-]   gate / (as) the QART cave of light (!) /      +
(matrix) existences to make (‘as created concepts’) , 
the combination ‘stargate (SBA) + QERT’ is important as defining the latter ,
where QART + light reads as ,
  (the cave of-) the light by the one of speech (at) the high place (QA) ,
where : “a gate” is also ‘a mouth’ through the idea of emitting
and hence it says ‘the one of speech’ here ;
 
so that ‘foreskin’ QARNATÁ reads ,
the flesh / (of) the staff (axis / phallus) / (for) (matrix) existence (NA) /     + 
(as) the mouth (gate) (R) / (at) the high place (QA) ,
confirming that ‘their foreskin represented this gate’ ;
 
then the QAR root changes in QER – for hieroglyphs work with ‘clusters’ :
QERAI ‘victory’ (=they conquered the gate) ,
QERTT\\ ‘the cave from which the Nile was believed to rise’ (=which is not
true ofcourse since the Egyptians weren’t stupid) ,
QERR ‘an offering by fire’ (=sic sic ! Adam’s strange fire theme !) ,                      <<<

and this one , QERNATÁ , >>> no ‘leather coverings for the tips of phalli’ but the same ‘foreskins’ as QARNATÁ since it is the same cluster and theme !

 
now that is a sweet victory ; )
 
the fáct that Esau started this ritual
suggests that the theme of this gate “was the weakest link” in their system
of plundering Eden — and hence Adam later secured it with his ‘strange fire’ …
 
  and finally – the Scroll :
… apart from the above quotes ,
and the sections about “I will draw My sword from its sheath” where the sword
is ‘the eden-vector” , and ‘the Locusts having opened that gate wherefore they
could open the mouth (gate) of the eden-mother” , all is the birthright theme 
as “the sceptre of Eden” ;
 
another (very corrupt) chapter is Is.22 from where came the lines in Rev.3 said
to the Philadelphia-church (the 144) “I have the key and will close and open”  —
it’s impossible to restore Rev.3 ,
yet instead of ‘key’ (-KleiS) ‘birthright’ (-prôtotoKoS) when this gate is closed :
which is a very good reason for Him to return !
and the same context we had in Ex.32-33 ,
where “the winning the birthright CAUSES His return” !
 
in her original Is.22 in 15-16 this theme may show ,
not as ‘the treasurer (called) Shebna who is over the·house”
but ‘the sceptre (shbn=shbth) […]   of the house of over=Eden (Ol=Odn)‘ 
[perhaps even the sceptre of which=birthright (ashR=bkR) of Eden]   ,
and not “he that is hewing a tomb on high”       (‘high’ was the QA glyph !)
but ‘they hew=opened (Chtsb=phqCH) – the tomb=gate (qbr=shrth) on high’ 
yet since it’s late into the chapter for in (7) the Locusts opened it , see below ,
it must have said ‘when (the sons have) the sceptre I will close the gate
on high that they (Locusts) have opened’ ,
so that next section , “in that day…” ,
must be the context that He actually returns ,
(23-25 the ‘vessels’ is about us restored in our Originals b/c ‘birthright theme’) ,
but it’s difficult to see what happens in 20-22 :
20                                                                                                                                                  [20-22a : probability 90% :]  
and it (‘judging the Locusts’) (will) happen – in – that day     +
b
[=when]   I (will) call=send – my servant – to elkim=gather (ALQim=LAQsh) (‘verb now’)
c
the sons of – hilkiah=Ishral (‘144’) ,      +
21
[=when]   [=they]   (will have) clothe=won (Ex.32-33?) – [=their]   robe=birthright (Kthnth=bKr)
b
[=so that]   I (will) fasten=close – the girdle=gate :                         [theme end !]         [but 2x no match] 
c
[=for]   – the rule=sceptre (mSHl=SHbth) – I (will) give – in [=their]   hand 
d
[=as]   – the father=birthright (aB=Bkr) – (that) to=again – (will have) become     +
e
unto – [+my]   jerusalem=sacred ones (‘Originals’) (irSHlm=qdSH) (‘swapped’)     +
f
(that) (will) dwell – [..]   [=in]   the house of – judah=Eden ;
[22]  
[now ‘the eden-axis’ can appear ; a-c : we had that phrase ! :] 
–
and I (will) set – the key=sceptre (‘no match’) of – house=iron (Bth=Brzl)     +                                [‘axis’] 
b
of david=Eden (duD=odN)       +                                                                                                         [or ‘as My sword’] 
c
on=over – [=my]   shoulder=sanctuary (‘gate’) (SHkM=MqdSH) ,                                      [see earlier pic] 
d
and he (will) opens=rule (‘no match’) – [..]   the no=nations (-of demons) (ain=guim)
e
[… unknown / can be many things ….] 
 
the reconstruction is very strong — that the birthright (-sceptre) is represented
by the (restored) eden-axis which forever will rule them ;
Esau is a coward for he placed verbs we need elsewhere and this reminds
much of his cowardness in the final lines of Ex.32-33 (page) so that the same
type Esaus must have corrupted both this book and Exodus
or you thought that “the in Qumran found Isaiah scroll now so proudly shown
in a building in that plot of land” was ‘to show how ancient the Scroll is’ ?
ofcourse not — selfproud Esau is parading the by him corrupted ‘scroll’ ….] 
[falsifying chapter theme :
(1) burden                                                                        (=unresolved problem)
(4) daughter of [=tsiun] 
(6) Elam / quiver / horsemen / chariots = Locusts / spears / breastplates / crowns ,
(7) and set [=them]  selves in array [=to]   the gate (!)
(8) gather together the waters of [=eden]                       (‘atmosphere’)
(15) (now the Shebna line) ;
as all good but probably too corrupt to can restore entirely] 
 

for you our Majesty ,
you entrusted us with finding it — and we did ;
however , in two more days will end the 40+ Atonement theme ,
yet the only event that definitely will prove that (-we was right with it)
will be when indeed you will get us — please
after that you please tell us everything that is on your mind
 

notes :
several pictures taken from this link [containing other interesting ones]   ,
also containing more ‘glyph texts’ concerning circumcision
but they – and her conclusions – are ofcourse all wrong for no one read the texts the right way ,
https://realpyramidtexts.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/14900-Book-of-the-Dead.pdf#page=511
 

 
[\ end of page]