content : … this is rather incredible    — until now we didn’t attempt this corrupt story  since there was no proper ‘key’ to unlock it  for these inventions can be ánything really , but more and more the ‘2 breads & 5 fishes’  seemed to introduce part III that we just did about “the three days of star & sceptre”  so that it was a continuing theme in which the twelve days must precede the three ! and get this , part I “John’s beheading” was never that :

no .

       it was not         “the head of – John – the Baptist”          but “the forehead of – Aaron – the priest” !
       since not           “John – was holy”                                              but “Aaron – was sanctified” !           
       because not    “John – was killed”                                            but “the remnant – died” !
       so that not       “the maid – wanted – his head”                  but “the angels – seal – the forehead” ! 
in fact ,
this is the perfect intro for part II , the alleged ‘two – breads’ Esau drivel that was “twelve – days” !
and the alleged ‘five – fishes’ was  “(12 days-) for the twelve – tribes” , 
while
part III (-see other page) “explains the three days of sealing (here) by the Star & Sceptre theme” :
this must be one of the most complete — and important right now — chapters of NT …   
 

 
                                                                                            theme
 
    … having started out this part II with a huge knot in the tummy (neverending , that) 
    because several themes could be projected upon this corrupted nonsense 
    especially “the 7 & 49th year” which is part of ‘the restored Scroll’ one ,
    where a phrase here could have been “lawless – people” as part of that sáme theme ;
    but more and more it looked like this ‘twelve days’ one ,
    and a massive confirmation of that is her embedding between part I and III
 
    what really is infuriating is Esau’s tragical nonsense-sections 
    where he has Christ & disciples & people doing nothing else as “coming and going” 
    then “eating and drinking” then “embarking a ship to depart somewhere else” 
    as a neverending soul-less , tragically Superficial and aimless set of haphazard events
    without ány Depth and as an endlessly boring narrative , leaving the reader behind in
    confusion asking WTF was the real message here behind all that smoke & mirrors ? 
    where ,
    his huge amount of useless verbs as ‘departing & arriving’ works terribly Frustrating 
    after finding an important close-root yet being unable to see “what happens next ?” ,
    and though this is true for áll of the corrupted scroll the impact is double at important
    themes like this one right now ,
    where you & we are asked to restore a totally messed-up Fall feast calendar
    while we cannot even find in the texts IF it was messed-up and if yes then how .. ?
 
    with this in mind please goto Part II (click) ,
    and see if you would (want to-) confirm please the buildup and also the ‘plot turns’
    at each line to verify the text content after each change that Esau must have seen ;
    because after describing “Esau’s corruption of the dates” 34 opens with you & we
    that will find the correct dates but as “the untraceable ones” , then stressing how 
    because He will nót return at the expected time they will search agáin
    (and this is an often reoccurring theme – that “the sons search the Scroll again”) ,
    followed by “their understanding of the 12 days sanctification of Aaron” 
 
    here the logic of the buildup is crucial — the reasoning is the most important 
    factor deciding whether the restored content can indeed be as what was intended ;
    and considering the extreme lengthy explanation ,
    starting with ‘Aaron’ then about “Esau having read that — and changing it” ,
    then “the 12 days for 12 tribes” closing with “explaining the three days” (in part III)
    we must conclude how He said here that these days have been corrupted ,
    wherefore you please carry the full impact of that with us
 
    the 12-day Atonement as an event in Heaven
    … because likely not much ‘happens to us’ during those days  —
    it is completely imaginable that each day “12,000 sons & daughters of a tribe” 
    are being declared by God to be part of the sealed ones , and not because the
    calling of their names ‘would take time’ (well it does) but in this official appointing
    Christ will ‘testify that the named person is admissable’ as we saw in the chapter
    where He says “that he will testify concerning that person” ,
    even though the text suggested that was happening ‘during the sealing’ 
    but because of the twelve day-Atonement this makes much more sense , right ;
    so that we may assume – and hope – that this is going on right now      —
    yes ,
    ofcourse we can be wrong and this event is ‘only scheduled next year’ ,
    we have no way of knowing except that we were asked to find the twelve days ,
    and since we DID we need to wait what will happen , please

   Mark 6 (full page) but overlapping with John 6

 
                                                                                             PART I

   spoiler : this section confirms the restored text as part II so that’s good ; ) 
 
   part I exists of two Esau-stories (and is very mixed)                     [in both Mk.6 & Lk.9] 
   first please ,
   in order for Him to explain about “the corrupted 12-day theme” later on in part II , 
   He must have told the disciples the ‘sanctification of Aaron’ : as a theme that Esau 
   turned into ‘the great commission of the apostles’ and ‘John Baptist beheaded’ ,
   yet both of his stories have problems :
   both lack a solid buildup while aspects are swapped (see table below) so that a text
   restoration seems impossible and the max we can do is ‘recognize quotes’ in them ;
   so that we need ,
   — a reference to ‘the day of Atonement’ 
   — and one to “the soul become humble”                                  [that will be ‘dying’ of the 144] 
   — and one to “being sanctified” ,                                                                                                       [same] 
   — then “Aaron the high priest dressed”                    [promise of ‘the Original’ for the 144]  
   — and “receiving a sign on the forehead”                           [that will be ‘the seal’ of the 144] 
   — the “12 days waiting at the Tabernacle entry” ;
   here ,
   you see how “being dressed” is also an aspect of the alleged ‘great commission’ 
   that even has “two and two” remniscent of the ‘two fishes & five breads’ corrupted
   theme in part II , supporting the chance that indeed this section was the intro ;
   [sub :] 
   however ,
   we still have a problem with “the three days after that” ,
   while we don’t know if those were explained in this specific (chapter-) narrative 
   since that might distract from the to-be explained ‘corrupted 12 days’ theme ,
   does that make sense please ? and looking at the remained text here it neither 
   seems to show references to those three days so that we continue with the above ; 
   we’re still looking in OT ‘what happened áfter that 12th day’ that Aaron had to wait
  
                                                                    [in ‘the great commission’ :] 
 
   #1 ‘wait at the door’ 
   as the first recognizable phrase in both chapters ,
           [Mk.6:9-10:] 
          “But [be]  shod with sandals ; and not put on two coats. And he said unto them , 
           In what place soever ye enter into an house, there abide till ye depart from that place.”  
           here ,
           line 10 is hilariously Void and you can see that Esau used an original phrase 
           but didn’t know how to properly end it , as one important for us because
          ‘and he (God) said=commanded them=him (Aaron)
           to go to the there=entry of the house=Tabernacle (‘close’!)
           to abide there and [=not]  depart from there’ ,
           where Esau swapped the time ,
           so that the “two=twelve (!) coats=days” should follow here ;
 
   #2  the priestly garment
   this part is very maimed — though at its right place befóre ‘the waiting’ ! ,
   where after line 9 (above) showing the materials “sandals” and “tunic” this has :
           [Mk.6:8:] 
          “And commanded them that they should take nothing for [their]  journey , 
           save a staff only; no scrip, no bread, no money in [their]  [=girdle] :”
           while we need
           girdle [shows]  , tunic [shows]  [though moved]  , and other attributes that were 
           part of the high-priest garment like ‘the breastplate’ (thôrax) and ‘a headdress’ 
           perhaps added with descriptions as ‘fine linen’ ;
 
   #3 anointing (the forehead with-) oil
   also at its right place ,
           [Mk.6:13:] 
          “And they cast out many devils, and anointed with oil many that were sick, and healed [them] .”
   here ,
   because of the common roots ‘forehead’ (metôpon) could be any word 
   and the same with ‘finger’ (daktylos) for to anoint the forehead with that oil ;
   the Esau that doctored Luke 9 left this out completely but now – just as Mk.6 –
   started another theme and you can feel how they both looked at the original            [change :] 
   text and pondering what to make of “anointing + the forehead” followed by 
   the explanation “as foreshadowing + of the sealing + of the 12 tribes” ,
   then coming up with their “John + the Baptist + beheaded” … !    
 
                                                        [in ‘John the Baptist beheaded’ :] 
 
   … this section is even less clear : the Esau that did Luke 9 left but three lines
   as virtually having deleted the “sealing of the 12 tribes” to be done with that ,
   while the Esau of Mark 6 here overdid his narrative using the key phrases in
   a now completely messed up story so that no full quotes are recognizable ;
            in (14) ,
          “John the Baptist risen from the dead” 
            likely was “the sons (‘you & we’) of Ishral rise up from among their people”,
           but any restored Scroll theme is completely erased ;
            what we need next is “that also the remnant (144) become to be because
            (19) has ,
            “ensnare” and “kill” 
             which must be ‘dying to the flesh’ , with as result
            (20) ,
            “John […]  a just man and holy” 
            as ‘the John=remnant of righteous man=souls that will be sanctified’ ;
            for in (21) ,
          “when comes to pass the day of the good-time [..]  as the birthday” 
            can only be ‘Atonement’ – and the same word ‘good-time’ shows in part II !
            and though ‘good-time’ can have been an exuse for ‘atonement’ per the
            roots (eukairos=katallagê) the use of that rare word also here is telling ;
            but then it gets tricky :
            perhaps the “dancing daughter” section explained why the people (Jacob)
            will not be sealed because “they do what they want” (22) and would be
            saying ‘our King (Christ) has saved us thefore we will not see tribulation’ 
            as the line we often had both in OT and NT ;
            perhaps , to finish this sub-story-line ,
            in (26) ,
           “being sorrowful” and “the oath” 
            is about the tribulation – when tired Jacob ‘will swear allegiance to IEUE’ 
            and also will be saved , perhaps closing with ‘the restored Eden paradise’ ,
            because now the sons of Esau are introduced :
 
                                                                        [start of part II] 
                                 [line 29 : Esau corrupts this narrative & timeline :] 
 
      starting with (29-30) ,
           “And when his disciples heard [of it] , they came and took up his corpse , 
           and laid it in a tomb . And the apostles gathered themselves together unto Jesus , 
           and told him all things, both what they had done, and what they had taught.”  
           as
           [=but]  (when-) the disciples=sons of his=Esau had heard=read [-this]  ,
           which must be followed by ‘their devious plan’ ,
           where the ‘tomb’ in 29 can be “(God’s-) scroll” (mnémeion=biblion) ,
           his corpse=words and=which [=he]  place=spoke in [..]  the tomb=scroll ;
    but then we have a problem    —
    in line 31 (restored text below) they already “misplace the Fall feasts dates” 
    yet how could they come to that idea ? what was the reasoning for that method ?
    here the weird line 28 as if added to previous ‘beheading’ section may help ,
           (28)
           “And brought his head in a charger , 
           and gave it to the damsel: and the damsel gave it to her mother.”
           what is this non-action ?
           it sounds like “they could not hinder God but cóuld hinder the sons of Ishral” 
           because of the type interaction between parties , and ‘hindering the latter’
           indeed could consist of ‘changing their (Fall-) feasts’ ,
           though it’s impossible to see where “feasts” could have appeared here  —
           so let’s continue :
 
      both Mk.6 and Lk.9 have a similar buildup ,
                                     Mark 6                                                     Luke 9                                     John 6
      –  ‘commission of the apostles’                 – same
      –  ‘John the Baptist beheaded’                  – same (but short)
      –  ‘the desert place’ (part II below)          – same                                    – same (chapter start)