content : ‘Acts 1 and 2’ appear to narrate two different events as His ascension and the coming down of the Spirit which however was the same story – just corrupted ; so that , the alleged “fiery tongues” was “the eden star”  that will be ‘coming [tó]  the (eden-) house’ together with his sceptre that also returns   — because when the birthright-construct (star on staff) is restored in tsiun it will ‘sound’ (2:3) : as a trumpet ! hence the Joel quotes about “the sun going dark” in chapter 2 indeed were part of this ongoing buildup : so that at this point ‘the male & female Original’  appear next to Him — not some ‘Moses & Eliah’ ….

the virgin within her morning-star

 
                                                                                         theme
 
   … we need to do things a bit different this time — but because of the insane corruption :
   so far we saw that the buildup is “the sceptre and star return to Eden , are restored ,
   then “give out a sound” akin to “a Trumpet” , signalling “the restored Eden-dimension”
   after which “this sun goes dark” and “Christ appears upon the clouds”  —
   in this ‘Acts 1-2’ ,
   the most important section for us now are the four lines we need to start with , below ,
   and after that we can look at the originally intended buildup ,
 
                                                                          the ‘Acts 1-2’ bridge
 
   by Esau presented situation 
   [in the closing lines of ‘Acts 1’]  : after Christ ascended , the disciples need to decide
                                                                          whom of two available candidates will fill in the place
                                                                          that now became vacant because of the traitor Judas
   restored [& virtually certain]  :   when explaining His return ,
                                                                          He explains that it will happen when the sons will have
                                                                          found the two eden-servants : the sceptre and his star :
 [end of ‘Acts 1’ :] 
  (24)                                                                                      
  [………] 
  ….  these two thou hast chosen,
  ….. these – two – whom – (the-) one=nations (-of demons) (hena=ethnos)    +                      [‘sceptre & star’] 
  n
  (had) chosen=taken away (eklegó=apagó) ;     +
  (25)
  [……..] 
  …. that he might go to his own place.                                                                                    [< phrase in Joel 2 & Rev.12] 
  …  (when-) he=they (will) go – to – [..]  (their-) own – place (‘Eden’) ;
 
[‘Acts 2’ :]                                                                                                                                                                [1-3 : >90% possible :] 
1
and – [..]  it (will have been) (fully-) accomplished                                                    [‘the going to their own place’ !] 
b
on – the – day of – pentecost=Trumpets (pentécosté=salpigx)                                                [and see 2-a ‘sound’]  
c
(that-) all=both – (will háve) were=returned – [..]  (to-) same=their – together=place ,     +   
 
2
[=as]  – (the-) sound – (that will) become     +
b
out=from (‘moved’) – (the-) suddenly=mountain (aphnö=oros) of – heaven=tsiun
c
when=by [-means of]  (the-) rushing=restored (pherÔ=katartizÔ)                                                 [so KJV syntax] 
d
wind=sceptre (pnOêS=rhabdOS) of – violent=Eden (biaios=eden)                                                                   [2-Tier] 
e
and=as – filled=standing (Pleroó=Paristêmi) – all=over – the – house=Sanctuary (sic)          [< expression] 
f
where – they=he (had) were=been – sotting=created (Kathémai=Ktizô) ;         +
 
3
[1x swapped :] 
–
and – (the-) them=star (autois=aster) – appearing – (like) (a-) [+cloud] 
b
[with-]  dividing=stretched out (diamErizÓ=ektEinÔ)    +                                                                  [similar adjective] 
c
tongues=eagle’s (glossá=aetos) – [..]  – fire=wings (pyros=pteryx)
d
seated – [..]  upon – (the-) one=summit of – them=his – each=sceptre (hekastos=rhabdos) ; 
 
                     [this shortly followed by ‘the sun going dark’ Joel 2 quotes here] 
 
  … the curious about these three lines (-and parts of the preceding ones) is that they
  run very solid : Esau was shrieking of joy when discovering that he could write them
  over with his ‘tongues of fire’ theme , so much that he corrupted word-for-word here !
  only áfter this you see he started to ghost-write again with his “being drunk at noon”
  nonsense — where originally straight away the ‘Joel 2’ section has followed
      [sub :
      though nowhere in the Scroll shows an explicit ‘3 days (-of darkness)’ ,
      a “third hour” shows here (‘Acts 2:15’) yet curiously also a “three + time frame” 
      appears in the Isaiah-Jeremiah ‘Moab’ chapters about the sceptre and star ,
      and even in the gospels where ‘the darkness’ however belongs to this theme  —
      we don’t know yet what to make of that , just keeping it in mind okay] 
 
                                                                           extended buildup :
 
   Christ returns when the birthright is restored 
   … you see how difficult it is when Esau removed entire sections and even turned this
   into ‘an ascension event’ that allegedly “was followed by a pouring out of the Spirit” ;
   and yes He returns when the Scroll is restored ,
   which however includes the star theme — the one aspect we still lacked until now …
 
   star & sceptre explained > Originals appear (not ‘Moses & Eliah’) > Ascension
   which MUST have been the sequence :
   the infamous lines in ‘Acts 1’ ,
            (4-5)
            “.. they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom 
            to Israel ?” And he said to them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons”
   can only have been ,
            when will the kingdom=land ishral=Eden be restored ?
            and he says : it will not know=happen in your time ;
   also because the disciples knew very well that first the Scroll needed to be restored ,
   where He appointed them to be our caretakers so that we would succeed !
   — in line 20 (of ‘Acts 1’) ,
        the “For it is written in the book of Psalms ,
                Let his habitation be desolate, and let no man dwell therein: […]”
                sounds like ‘the daughter of tsiun‘ theme : 
                as “the habitation (‘star’) will become desolate
                           b
                            [=for]  [..]  the let=virgin (estô=parthenos) dwelling therein” ,
   namely when God will revoke his grape-juice and wheat and clarified-oil (Joel 2 !)
   from her as the aspects she received until that moment , wherefore she will start
   to desire to return to tsiun – so said in other prophets ; 
   — then 23 ,
        as “the two=sceptre (DuO=rhabDOs) of joseph=Eden” ,
        followed by “her [=tabernacle]  called the justus=star of the matthis=morning” ,
   — so that in next 24-25 ,
        the subject of “the two” are ‘the Eden sceptre and his star’ !
 
   also (in 25) the “go to the own place” is important for us — a phrase like that makes
   no sense there but for us it dóes because it is a line in Joel 2 and Revelation 12
   where here it has the colour of “a promise — whén the sons will find both of them” ;
   and hence the “this will fully be accomplished” in next ‘Acts 2:1’ which is not about 
   the feastday that has come but ‘the return of the sceptre & star on that day’ ,
   which in turn can only be ‘at Trumpets’ because of all the presented context so far
 
   both Originals :
   … it were not “two angels saying ‘why are you looking up you men of Galilee’ (10-11)
   but “the pretty male & female Original appearing next to Christ” – not ‘Moses & Eliah’ –
   where God spoke from heaven “these are My people” ,
   which makes sense as the confirmation of the restored birthright theme ;
   where in the Mat.17 version Peter does not say “let us make three tabernacles” but
   exclaims “will we really TABERNACLE in those beautiful beings ?” (-see page) ;
   however ,
   the Originals must have appeared after the explanation of ‘the sceptre and his star’ 
   having been restored (start of ‘Acts 2’) , and indeed then the Joel 2 quotes show :
   but like in Joel 2 (-page) first must come ‘the moon as blood’ , followed by the
   alleged “old men dream dreams” which was ‘the restoration of the soul in them’ ,
   as the proper time when also the male & female Original must have appeared … 
 
                                                   the problem (?) of ‘no tongues of fire’ 
 
   … we need to be careful to not throw away everything now   —
   it is possible that He promised ‘I will send the Spirit’ : where however Esau ran
   with that line and constructed an entire false theology about the Spirit now supporting 
   this evil flesh and that ‘one would be born again when having the Spirit’ and the silly
   nonsense about all kind of assumed good fruits ;
   Esau removed these two chapters from one of the gospels (hence ‘Acts’ in brackets)
   in order to construct his entire “the spirit-type-of-life áfter the Ascension” where this
   story here was the foundation of all his similar corruptions in the post-gospel ‘letters’ 
   álso because with this hoax he was able to cover-up many other genuine themes :
            (‘Acts 1:1’)
            “[This]  [is]  the first treatise I am making ,O Theophilus ,
             of all that Jesus began both to do and teach,”
   …sure .
 
   [if you’re new here – Christ repeatedly urged “the soul to die to her flesh” because
   that was the escape for her from her enemy (‘the flesh’) which He now had provided
   for her through His sacrifice — but Esau has corrupted all of these instances] 
 
   at the start , ‘Acts 1:4-5’ has ,
            ” wait for the promise of the Father [..]   the Holy [=Spirit]  not many days hence.” ,
   which however , IF was said , was not part of the Ascension theme here ,
   but must have been said during the goodbye-supper before going to the Olive mount ;
   [still showing in next 5 “When they therefore were come together….” as next theme]  ,
   yet inserted here by Esau as intro to his own “fiery tongues” hoax in next chapter 2 
 

   [perhaps more additions will follow]