| [theme] : the word-root “half” [-qts] : Esau’s many corruptions of the expression ‘the two halves of heaven’ [Behemoth & Leviathan] like in Zech.14 the (alleged-) “mountain of Olives will split in two halves” — yet this specific one [-and 30x !] , “the house of – Eden – for [-again to rule] – the two – halves of – the heavens [as] the two – monsters of – the sea [‘dimension’ of ‘Space’] – Behemoth – and Leviathan” , corrupted into : “the Reubenites – and Gadites – and the half – tribe of – Manasseh (inheriting-) the kingdom of – Sihon – and the kingdom of – Og – the kings of – the Amorites” [2025-12dec.07+11] |
please remember ,
| the ’10-months theme’ is about God’s Covenant shown in Genesis 15 through the sacrificial animal as ‘cut up into two halves’ with space inbetween : both parts represented the ‘two halves of heaven as the monsters Behemoth and Leviathan , while the space in the middle was “the Eden realm” as again to be the one inbetween ruling both halves ; however , after Gen.15 the “two halves” notion vanishes from the Scroll or better : only appears in bizarre phrases all based upon the root (-qts) “half” , so that Esau concealed the reason of the Covenant … |
through which per all context so far ‘ten’ lamps crossed (?) [see part II here] |
theme
… so far – but there are more – we had two text examples how Esau corrupted the
expression “the two halves (-qts) of heaven’ into a phrase with a similar structure
yet now telling “outside” through the related root (-quts) ,
wherefore it was useful to look at the root ‘half’ (-qrs) itsélf to see how it develops
after Genesis 15 , and – bingo – the shown phrases get weirder by the minute :
— “half eaten flesh” (in Numbers) ,
— “half a hin” (in Numbers) ,
then this ,
—“the [sons] of Gad and the [sons] of Reuben and the half the tribe of Manasseh”
and that shown about 28 times ! ,
after which this one morphs into óther strange examples ;
clearly Esau invented themes to can hide the (-qts) root in , and though several
individual examples are worth to look at — for the “half a hin” appears in the chapter
listing the Feast-days (Num.28) and cóuld say something about our date ! —
this “half-tribe” obviously is the most bizarre , while nobody knows what it means …
the “halve – tribe of – Manasseh” : option : about ‘Behemoth and Leviathan’ ?
looking at that strange phrase ,
the first example show in Numbers 32:33 ,
“Moses gave unto them, [even] to the [=sons] of Gad, and to the [=sons] of Reuben,
and unto half the tribe of Manasseh the son of Joseph, the kingdom of Sihon king of
the Amorites, and the kingdom of Og king of Bashan, the land,
with the cities thereof in the coasts, [even] the cities of the country round about.”
but ,
often (like in Deut.4) the ‘foreshadowing theme’ is in play so that we carefully need
to read “which land here” – and the context is ‘Eden’ ; so that it was NOT about the
dividing of that literal land and hence NO “Reuben or Gad or Manasseh” showed ,
but instead were Esau’s cover-ups for another theme
but why are these ‘two tribes + a half’ singled out and linked to “two kings” ?
while that entire phrase rather consistently appears (-but in slightly different forms)
and even in the Joshua 2 prophetic chapter ;
here , previous 32 is about “crossing over .. into the land Canaan our inheritance” ,
but since the context is Eden it must have written “canaan=Eden (knon=odn)”
what if that “half – tribe of – Manasseh” was “half – two – heavens” ?
as “the halves – tribe=two (shbt=shn) of – manasseh=heavens (mnshe-shmm)“
which then reads as “the two (adj.) – halves of – heaven” ?
it feels very possible ,
and because the phrase “two kings of Sihon and Og” consistently fóllow after that
then “the kingdoms of Sihon and Og” must be “Behemoth _ Leviathan” !
in fact “kingdom” is not far away from “realm” (‘dimension’) and compare that with
their description as “two monsters” — how much is the chance ..?
however , because Esau used “real-time names” like Sihon and Og ofcourse the
used roots will not match those of ‘Behemoth and Leviathan’
yet the first part of the line is more problematic :
what was the action befóre ‘the two halves of heaven’ as “giving – land” ?
[collected examples :]
“And Moses gave unto them, [even] to the children of Gad, and to the children of Reuben”
“and the cities thereof, gave I unto the Reubenites and to the Gadites.”
“their land, and gave it for an inheritance unto the Reubenites, and to the Gadites,
and to the half tribe of Manasseh.”
“And Moses the servant of the LORD gave it [for] a possession unto the Reubenites,
and the Gadites, and the half tribe of Manasseh.”
hm ..
not ‘Moses’ can ‘give’ anything so it’s another subject , while it is unsure if the
phrase was ‘Reubenites’ or ‘sons of – Reuben’ that could make a great difference
in interpretation ; yet the sequence : “Reubenites and Gadites” seems frequent ;
Moses – gave – land … but Moses hás nothing “to give” …
moses – gave – land + (noun) + (noun)
what is with the dualistic realm ? — they are “ruled” by Eden .. by “10 months” !
[Joshua 12:]
[=when] – he=you gave=declare +
b
the moses=months (mSHe=chdSH) – servant=10 (ObED=chODEsh) – (to) IEUE
c
[as] the tenancy=number (irshe=mspht) of +
d
[..] the reubenite=house (rBEn=BEth) of – gadite=Eden (gaD=oDn) [the 2x noun]
e
[=for] [+to rule] (?) (‘was always left out by Esau?’) – the two – halves of – heaven
[Josh.2:]
f
[=as] the two – kings=monsters of – the·Amorite = the sea (‘dimension’) (AMr-i=i-AM)
g
(that are) the king=monster – Sihon=Leviathan (shoN-luthN)
h
and the king=monster – Og=Behemoth (Og=bmOth) ,
[by context:]
i
he=I (will make) [+you] to give=cross over – (to) [+your] ineritance (‘Eden’) :
how does that sound please .. ?
and because the prophetic chapter Joshua 2 links to this theme while it is the intro
to the actual crossing-over into the land as foreshadowing of coming to Eden
with the blatant theme of “crossing over through water” — ‘dimension’ in our case ,
per definition linked to Behemoth and Leviathan , the content above must be valid !
[will be continued] xxx







