content : … a ‘plus 40 days judgment time after Weeks’ for several reasons is very difficult to prove , but Esau – after corrupting the scroll about it – may have feared it because his own calendar shows this date and titled ‘adversaries’ = us ..    also important in this context is him having  tampered with the ’40 days theme’ by making  old-Ishral to arrive forty days later at Horeb  as only at Weeks and not at Unleavened

 
[8/7:] added (here) : interesting probability

                                                                                           theme
 
    … it’s true – we are not very good at ‘finding our Date’ ;
    though some twenty months ago we assumed having found every possible theme
    it turned out that several important ones still were undiscovered – which however
    was only more complicating the ‘date theme’ because it created multiple options ;
    greatly urging the search for our date is that past year it became impossible to go
    bear this cycle of death week in week out , and after the so hoped day of Weeks
    also turned out empty the next candidate ‘Atonement’ was (is) just too far out still …
 
    a possible +40 days
    … greatest problem ofcourse is that ‘none of the main seven feasts’ is involved in
    a possible +40 days scenario where from the final three we had ‘Trumpets’ as the
    start of the restoration of the Scroll ; where ‘Atonement’ would appéar a candidate
    for the start of the Tribulation because of “the one animal sent into the desolation” 
    (where the other sacrificed – to own flesh – animal represents us 144) ,
    while Booths is about us re-building Eden and the time Jacob will be delivered 
    (see several pages and recently found at the end of Genesis 34) ;
    so that the +40 days seems a hopeless endeavour to be able to substantiate …
 
    a +40 day pattern
    … perhaps the clearest example is “after old-Ishral made the statue at Weeks as
    causing the Strange fire by Adam” they were judged to ‘another 40 (-years)’ in the
    desert before entering the land ; other examples are less clear and not only due
    to corruption but because we need the specific ‘forty days after the day of Weeks’ ;
    concerning the latter ,
    we found the important theme “Adam as (passover-) sacrifice in the final Jubilee”
    and even the entire “four (5) locusts & the birthright” : but would not the judgment
    period fall in the forty days from Unleavened unto Weeks , instead of a separate
    added forty days áfter Weeks ..? 
    or would this separate added time frame be a pattern , like those +40 (-years) ?
    as always , we first need a workable idea – not in the least because Esau has
    virtually erased (the number) ’40’ in all prophets and all of NT ….
 
    in recent sections we found a possible grammar as “a doubled forty days” but
    without a solid surrounding context it remains an option (-only) which is rather
    frustrating because of the urgency of our escape ; wherefore , searching more
    confirmation , also ‘not directly biblical’ themes happen to come along     —
    this month three years ago from 24-26 July unexpectedly He radiated that
    incredible Kindness of Him to the soul as an unforgettable experience for her
    (well until she died last year) but the reason for that date never became clear
    and the whole event was shelved :
    until three weeks ago it again came to mind after Weeks turned out empty 
 
    Esau’s ’17th of Tammuz’ – 26 July
    … we already had his tampering with the theme and date of Atonement ,
    but this anomaly is even more insane for no discernable reason, or better for
    the same type concocted ‘reasons’ we are used to from him , this random date
    heralds ‘three weeks’ of alleged mourning ending the ninth of Av (fifth month) ,
    where this ’17 Tammuz’ was intended to start 40 days after Weeks !
    Welcome to the Creator’s Calendar – The Creators Calendar — scroll to fourth month
    so what’s going on here .. ?
 
    the corrupted Time lines & Esau’s ‘three weeks’ 
    … to start with the curious description of his ‘Three Weeks’ :
    the time between the 17th of Tammuz and the 9th of Av is presented as days
    of mourning because of baa-haad things happened to his people (see below)
    and therefore this period is dubbed “between the (dire-) straits” 
    as [-bein]  ‘between, among’ and a derivation of root [-tsir]  ‘adversary, hostile’
    and knowing how Esau thinks ‘the intended adversaries’ are ‘you & we’ ;
    the gleaned phrase appears in Lamentation 1 (among others) and though we
    have not made an attempt at that small book , glancing over the first chapter
    shows the theme is “the daughter of tsiun – as the mother and the Eden land”
    as the birthright and locusts directly related to the ’40’ , 
    which in turn links to Zechariah 8 , see below ;
 
    the 2 x 40 days  
    we ofcourse learned that Esau totally hid the importance of ‘declaring the scroll’ 
    [-and therewith His eternal eden-covenant !]  at the day of Unleavened ,
    and the subsequent accéptance by God of the Scroll ánd His people at Weeks 
    [-except if the scroll got corrupted and / or the people had failed to declare it]  ;
    and in order to cover up the declaring part ,
    Esau had the people old-Ishral arrive at Horeb only ‘in the third month’  —
    below , both diagrams share a ‘2 x 40 days’ but the key event is [#A]  please : 
 
                                   Esau                                                                                         Reality
 
– old-Ishral leaves Egypt at Passover                – old-Ishral leaves Egypt at Passover
– [erased]                                                                           – journey to Horeb just before Unleavened
                                                                                                     as the reason they had to hurry
– people arrive at Horeb at Weeks                     – people arrive at Horeb at Unleavened
    Moses upon mount for 40 days                             Moses upon mount for 40 days
– people have made the calf ,                                  – people made the idol statue Adam claimed
    Moses breaks the tablets :                                        so that God will not accept [=Weeks]  them
    date : 40 days after Weeks                  [#A]       – date : at Weeks itself
– Moses again goes up the mount                        – Moses never ‘broke tablets’ since he had
    for a second set of tablets                                         written down the Scroll in the first 40 days ,
    as another 40 days on the mount                         while God hád told him something about
                                                                                                       a prophetic future judgment period (?)
                                                                                                       as another +40 days after Weeks (?)                 [#A] 
  total : Weeks + 80 (87) days                                       total : Weeks + 40 days (?)
 
  now please : the “Tammuz 17th” are both [#A] ‘s in both time lines 
  shown through the by him ordained text to be recited in this period ,
  where his “Moses another 40 days on the mount” is but an Empty shell 
  since nothing of value happens there — but only Esau’s mumbo jumbo —
  as another indication that indeed “+40 days after Weeks was intended” ;       
  but why he invented ‘three weeks’ ?
  perhaps because “one single day” was difficult to defend while a period
  of another ’40’ would raise questions so he decided a neutral time frame
  long enough to generate more spiritual energy – it’s but a guess for who 
  knows the mind of a full-blown Psychopath .. ?
          [sub :
          becáuse of Esau’s time line some assume the existence of a hidden
          feast dubbed ‘the feast of new wine’ 40 (or 50) days after Weeks ,
          others even take that further by adding anóther 40 to that time frame
          as ‘a feast of oil’ , claiming the so-called ‘Temple scroll’ did suggest 
          these periods ; but since that scroll álso exists by Esau the question
          is whether he just overdid it on purpose – as another smokescreen] 
 
  the alleged events in his ‘Three Weeks’
  [from his book ‘Mishnah’ :]  “Five things happened to our forefathers on 
  the Seventeenth of Tammuz (and five on the Ninth of Av) : 
  a) on the Seventeenth of Tammuz were the tablets broken , 
  b) the daily sacrifice ceased , during a siege on Jerusalem , 
  c) the city was breached , 
  d) Apostomos burned the Torah, and put up an idol in the Temple” ;
  now ,
  like in any occult Ritual [-of him]  the attributes are the most important as
  descriptions that automatically have “a prophetic type nature” because of
  the use of certain terms , which could have happened ‘in the past’ but are
  also valid ‘for the future’ — compare prophets where the sacking of the
  city Jerusalem’ was a metaphor for “this earth” destroyed in the endtime   
 
  a) the alleged ‘breaking the tablets’ 
  … starting with this one since it relates to the above time table   —
  we can only know what Esau intended by looking at his ordained chapter 
  readings starting that Tammuz 17th which is Exodus 32:11-14 and 34:1-10 :
  the first is short and too vague [=disarmed by him]  ,
  yet the second – though very corrupt – is extremely interesting for us right
  now since the section seems to be about ‘the +40 days now & our date’ 
  [as a continuation from the closing of previous chapter 33]  ;
  in the first lines of 1-10 show “(standing on the-) cloud” combined with the 
  terms ‘two (‘double’)” and “first” – but not as “(make) two (new tablets like) 
  the first (ones)” ofcourse , but akin to the type grammar mentioned earlier 
  as “a double (40 days) (like) the first (40 days)” !
  ofcourse it will need to be worked out but the chance is VERY high here  —
  implying that Esau’s entire goal was to target the +40 days prophecy !
  because in Ex.34:1-10 the subject already is ‘the second set of 40 days’
 
  the nasty aspect here is ,
  that Esau also by corrupted lines derives Legal right for his occult Ritual :
  unless YOU & WE find out what our God réally said in the original lines !
  that’s the only way to break the curse as this Ritual that was empowered
  annually for 2000+ years now ;
  while a more positive aspect (-for us) is that by nature the by him chosen
  text sections ‘form an interlinked chain’ — so that we do not need to go
  understand évery single corrupted line but , at least , any section that will
  show us the intended main theme ;
  for example , he also uses Zechariah 8 to justify his “17th of Tammuz” 
  through a line there as “the fast of + the fourth + month” : now God máy 
  have spoken about our ’40-day theme’ (perhaps even likely He did so ,
  since Esau knows very well what he corrupted) ,
  however the entire section is so irretrievably corrupted that our Legal win
  is through Exodus 34 (and others) because of the same chain concept 
 
  in that same Zechariah line also plays the already mentioned prophetic  
  aspect about the relation between past & future , or as Esau puts this ,
  “In fact, the Talmud says that after the future redemption of Israel and the
  rebuilding of the Temple, these fast days will be re-dedicated as days of 
  rejoicing and festivity. For as the prophet Zechariah says : the 17th of 
  Tammuz will become a day of “joy to the House of Judah, and gladness 
  and cheerful feasts.” [aish com]  ;
  this contextually translated : 
  it is “about the day of joy when Jacob forever will have been defeated” 
  as his intént that could well link to the end of this whole ‘+40 day theme’ 
  because note the phrasing about ‘the 17th’  
 
  d) the burning of the thorah scroll by Apostamus
  … the figure ofcourse is completely invented , 
  in the same way how Esau wrote his silly 1 & 2 ‘Maccabees’ to support
  his corruption of the Atonement theme , so this is not difficult to decode :
  “The Gemora tells us that we know this event happened on the seven-
  teenth of Tamuz as a tradition from our forefathers, but does not tell us 
  who Apostamus was, or what the significance of the Torah scroll was. 
  The R””av writes that Apustamus was a Greek officer at the time of the 
  second Temple. The Tiferes Yisroel offers two possible explanations as 
  to the significance of the scroll. One is that this scroll was the one written 
  by Ezra HaSofer, Ezra the Scribe. The text was the most authoritative, 
  and all other Torah scrolls that were written were checked against this 
  one for accuracy and errors. Another understanding is that he burnt every 
  Torah scroll he could find ; but either way, the intent behind Apostamus’ 
  actions remain the same: to eradicate Torah from the nation of Israel.”
  … here ,
  Esau was so cocky to add further explanantion of his “adversaries” note
  since ofcourse ‘Apostamus’ also is you & we , G646 -apostiasa hence
  our term ‘apostasy’ , here as us against Esau’s corrupted scroll ;  
 
  b) the ‘daily sacrifice ceased’ at the 17th
  … this one is more difficult    —
  it is not exactly ‘daily’ (-ium) but ‘continually’ (-thamd) as in ‘ordinance’ ;
  the Exodus 29:38-42 lines to be read on this day are very corrupt but the
  section is about “two lambs being offered” where the context is about our
  recent theme as the final Passover ‘that Adam will be chosen’ ;
  compare Esau’s smokescreen ,
  “The Tiferes Yisroel, a commentator on the Mishna, gives another possible 
  explanation. We see from the Gemora in Baba Kama (82b) that there were 
  two brothers who were members of the Hashmonean family (Chanukah fame). 
  These brothers, Aristablus and Hyrkanus, fought each other for the throne of 
  Judea. Aristoblus laid siege to Jerusalem where Hyrkanus was headquartered. 
  As lambs were needed for the daily sacrifice and there were none in Jerusalem, 
  the inhabitants worked out a deal with the lamb-sellers outside of the city.
  Everyday, the Jerusalemites would lower a basket full of gold coins over the wall. 
  In return, the lamb-sellers would supply a lamb, which was then hoisted up. 
  One day, an elderly man outside of the wall advised the sellers to supply a pig
  instead of a lamb. As the pig was unknowingly being hoisted up, the pig stuck its 
  claws into the wall, and all of Israel quaked. From this day until the end of the 
  siege, the daily offering was not brought.” ;
  this nonsense is a tad more difficult to decode but has the same components ,
  where ‘the brother war’ is about ‘Jacob vs Esau’ (-see recent Genesis chapter)
  and the inverted aspect of ‘the lamb’ representing ‘Adam’ here ;
  however this still is about ‘the end of the 40-day period’ – as Tammuz 17th – 
  so that what wé need is the relation between ‘Adam chosen’ (at Passover) 
  and ‘a possible judgment upon Adam at the end of these 40 days‘ .. no ?
 
    also in the Three Weeks : reading the alleged ‘Pi-nachash’
    … said as thus ,
  “On the first Shabbat of the Three Weeks (or on the 17th of Tammuz itself
  if it falls on Shabbat) we almost always read the Torah portion of Pinchas.”
  and they mean the sections Numbers 25:10-30 and further ;
  “Pinchas opens with God’s promise of a “covenant of peace” for the zealot 
  [priest-]  Pinchas, followed by a census. The daughters of Tzelofchad request 
  and receive new laws regarding inheritance. God instructs Moses to prepare 
  Joshua for leadership, and God describes sacrifices brought daily and on the
  special occasions.” ;
  … a quick look shows that the real theme ofcourse was ‘serpents’ (-nachash)
  as the four locusts that stole the birthright , where no ‘daughters of Tselopath’ 
  featured but the eden-mother aka the daughter of tsiun ; while this phantom
  priest was not ‘zealous’ but the serpent-race was jealous (same root)         —
  now hów long we’re doing this yet STILL meet themes tampered by Esau ,
  and his corruption-project must have been a phenomenal large enterprise …
 
  closing : ‘ADAM judged at Tammuz 17th’ .. ?
  … all the above is as far as we’re able to get , now ,
  and though it all looks promising (!) we will , by (Esau’s) nature , be unable
  to find any line that indeed Adam will die at that point ; so that the final word
  about it must – and should – be said about it by our own God
  and let’s hope that will be “at the end of this month” ….
 
  
  [if new developments they be posted here] 
  interesting for ús is “Adam chosen & the link with the 40-day judgment period” 
       
[addition 8/7 :] 
… after “the 40 (-years)” punishment of old-Ishral because of the statue of Adam
that they offered fire to at Horeb , at the day of Weeks , that situation is being
restored by now ‘Moses being at the mountain Nebo – at Weeks ! – to re-confirm
the eden covenant between God and the people ; 
after which “twelve spies from each of the twelve tribes spy out the land”    —
it says they did that “for forty days” , and this can be a key : 
     – representing the ’12 tribes’                                                                                        [144] 
     – that ‘spied out the land’                                                     
     – before they would enter it                                                                           [enter Eden] 
     – during ’40 days AFTER Weeks’                   [since Nebo was about restoring
                                                                                                 the previous failed acceptance 
                                                                                                 at mount Horeb (at Weeks) so that
                                                                                                 a similar condition was required !)
    – the spies returned “in the time of                [a type grapes CAN be ‘ripe’ end                  
        the firstripe grapes” (Num.13:20)                of July so the time frame is possible] 
    – however ,                                                                     important :
        some spies of the 12 “feared” as                   the ‘judgment time of the 144’ 
        being Negative of their chances :                  where the serious ones need no fear
        they were judged by God                                  but the pretenders are removed
                                                                                                  (see pages)
 

        again , please – it is no solid proof ,
        but “the judgment of the 12 that did NOT believe” linked to “the forty days” 
        that they espied the land appears to be a foreshadowing of our situation where
        those that but pretended to be part of the 144 (see pages) are judged – no ?
 
        therefore the only Valid context we have is the above    —
        it has no sense to search terms as “harvest” and “new wine” to try justify this
        possible time frame – as ‘the watchman community and her feast of new wine’ 
        is doing – not only because much is corrupt but “the great harvest” can just as
        well point to ‘the deliverance of Jacob at the very end’ :
        our ‘forty days’ is the most important perhaps helped by the addition that it was
       the time in which the spies ‘could return carrying a cluster of first-ripe fruits’ ….