in ‘the·eighth’ & ‘circumcision’ [-but not ‘of Christ’ (Lk.2) where Phenuel = Atonement shows] as corruptions óf the +40 – text fragments only – [version ; 2025-07end July] |
#1 ‘circumcision’ always appears in the ‘consecration’ theme
… and in this way :
where the consecration always is about “the soul tainted because of the flesh” ,
Esau turned that theme into “you shall not defile your flesh” ,
and (in some way-) he connected the latter with his circumcision ;
while in NT he created ‘an updated version’ as ‘circumcise your heart’
which ofcourse is the same meaningless but in order to establish a Link
(occult Rituals require that !) with the old testament , as said in Rom.11-12 :
“Abraham had received the sign of circumcision
as the seal of righteousness [< against the 144]
to be the father of circumcision
not only to the circumcised ones [read : the Esau tribe]
but also to those of the faith” [read : christians]
so that ,
with lines as this he has spread on his Ritual to christianity ,
first by linking his ‘circumcision’ to Christ , see first A) as Luke 2
as an abomination you & we have undone , ofcourse ;
considered the below list ‘the consecration theme’ is in álmost ALL examples ;
#2 the ‘the·eighth day’ (-of circumcision)
… apart from several times in OT ,
also appearing in (-mentioned Luke 2 and) Philippians 3 , see B) ,
where it results in “being changed into the glorious body” so that the original
theme here was the same 40 day consecration ;
#3 mentioned : Atonement (-as ‘Phenuel’ in Luke 2 ! from Ex.32)
… the Luke 2 example is very interesting , see there ;
where in C) the Lev.19 cut-off section it was part of the buildup ;
#4 the (álmost mentioned-) ’40 days’
… in Luke 2 as “eighty – four – years” (IN the ‘Phenuel’ line) ,
in C) as ‘the fourth – year ,
but remember that all “the·eighth day” ones álso were ’40’ ;
#5 curious : ‘the fire-offering at Atonement’
… see D) ; in the listing of feasts Esau added the illegal ‘fire-offering’
because it is part of the birthscepter / gate theme , see main page ;
there are a couple of more examples like how in the ‘listing of feasts’
chapters he glued “the·eighth day” under ‘Booths’ (=false) ,
and the now contextless but interesting Ez.43:26-27 ,
(26) ‘purify it’ (and) ‘seven days + (make) atonement’ […..] ,
(28) ‘and when the·days have ended , on the·eighth day ….’ ;
so that , with all the information we can find , we must conclude
that ‘the 40 days until Atonement’ was the original version ….
—————
A)
Luke 2 ‘eighth day’ / circumcision / consecration / birthright /
Phenuel=Atonement (Ex.32-33 !) / blessing / four=fourty
as the alleged ‘circumcision’ (-of Jesus) ;
– ofcourse utterly corrupt and cannot be restored — yet contains a number of key words ,
– the buildup of the +40 days theme does show here ,
– Esau used ‘Phenuel’ here which is proof that it wás this theme ,
– result : not ideal but very helpful
apart from also having disconnected that ugly ritual from Him
(21) ‘the eighth day’
(23) ‘male – open – womb’ (consecration theme , not posted yet)
(25) ‘someone is waiting to see Christ’ (144 are?)
(28) ‘someone is blessed’ (said when we have the birthright)
(29) ‘someone is departing’
(34) ‘fall & rise – many in Ishral’ (testing of remnant of Ishral 144 ?)
(35) ‘thoughts of heart be revealed’ (the trial – we had that right before)
(36) ‘Phanuel’ (the ‘Anna the prophetess’ lines) <<<
‘7 years’
(37) ‘eighty – four – years’
now ,
thinking like Esau (yuk) : Phenuel was ‘Jacob wrestling with the angel’ !
what in the world is doing that place-name here ? who cáres ?
hé thought about it because originally it was the same theme he corrupted in OT !
we just did the Ex,32-33 one and for many reasons it can have been ‘Atonement’ ,
and see how it connects with numbers also here : four=fourty years=days ?
also note ,
that even here it follows after “searching hearts” that is “the trial time” ,
so that (28) said “those that succeed will be blessed”
but already starting in (23) “the (time of) consecration” ,
starting “the eighth day = the 40 days (from Weeks)” ;
but , searching for the still missing “birthright” theme here ,
it can have started at ‘Simeon’ (in 25) after “the eighth day” lines 22-24 ,
where ‘Simeon’ is a corruption of ‘the sons of Ishral’ [no ‘man in Jerusalem’]
the ‘birthright’ must have shown in this word :
[in the phrase “(who was) waiting – for the consolation of – Ishral”] ,
as ‘(the sons-) (will have) wait=acquired +
b
the consolation=birthright (paraklésis=prôtotokos !) of – [..] ishral=Eden ;
conclusion :
… though the section cannot be restored it does contain all the key phrases ,
and even shows a rather congruent buildup — where indeed “the sanctification”
(the trial) is starting after Weeks “then on the 40th day Phenuel=Atonement” ;
[sub :
closing lines 39-52 as Esau’s toddler story about ‘the boy Jesus that ran away’
can have been about the two witnesses (144) that visit their people on earth
during the Tribulation ; comp. (44) ‘sought him among their kinsfolk’ looks too
much like “witness to their people” , etcetera]
B)
Philippians 3 ‘circumcision the eighth day’
– insanely corrupted , not restorable
– connects ‘circumcision’ with an , at the end (in 21) “be changed in a glorious body’ [sic]
– in (8) it has ‘that I may win Christ’ — was ‘win the birthright’ ?
– result : lost but that connection is useful
C)
Lev.19 the +40 days theme / hallowing / sceptre / Atonement
– a cut-off & inserted section
– shows the ‘circumcision’ theme
as corruption óf the +40 days one
– result : not ideal but helpful
(21) [but future tense ! :]
And he shall bring his trespass offering unto the LORD,
unto the door of – the tabernacle of – the congregation, sceptre of the house of Eden ,
[even] a ram for a trespass offering.
(22)
And the·priest make an atonement for him and the sons made atonement unto me ,
with the ram of the trespass offering + [‘by having obtained the birthright’]
before the LORD
for his sin which he hath done : and the sin which
he hath done shall be forgiven him.
(23)
And when ye shall come into the land, and shall
have planted all manner of
trees for food, righteous ones , (of the 144) (tree ots=tsdq)
then you uncircumcise his foreskin but I remove the unrighteous ones
his fruit from the remnant (see fruit in 24)
three – years shall (during) forty daysfor there be no lawlessness (?)
it shall not be eaten of. in her midst ;
(24)
But in the fourth year so that at the fourtieth day
all the fruit thereof shall be holy all the remnant will be holy (Gal.3)
to praise the LORD [withal] . before IEUE ;
(25)
And in the·fifth year as (!) the day of Atonement
shall ye eat of the fruit thereof, when I will gather the remnant (24)
that it may yield unto you the increase thereof:
I [am] the LORD your God.
here ,
the cadence (in the buildup) as “during 40 days > end of 40 days > ás Atonement”
fells better than “during 40 days > and at Atonement > in the year of the Jubilee”
because a ‘Jubilee year’ must be “a conclusion of a different theme”
the anti-circumcision line 28 : ‘you shall not cut in your flesh’
as
“Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you”
but as
and·laceration for·soul not you-shall-give in·flesh-of·you
and·writing-of brand-mark not you-shall-give in·you ;
a curious case :
1)
why did Esau not simply delete any line agáinst his ‘circumcision’ ?
2)
this line seems to be taken out of previous ‘sanctification’ section , above ;
because a similar line (5) shows in Lev.21 as corrupted section also about sanctification
[again proving that Esau has linked his circumcision to the 40 days theme] ;
3)
many strange (invented) roots and even as first time here ,
4)
God cán have said “you shall not cut yourself”
[but not “you shall not circumcise yourself” ofcourse , that’s nonsense] ,
but then not in this place (nor in Lev.21) simply because it wasn’t the theme —
so that there only is one possibility :
Esau DID see “you shall not cut yourself” élsewhere — and deleted it ,
and because he had inserted his own ‘circumcision theme’ so well ,
in his zeal to change (=disarm) the content of the ‘consecration chapters’
[that seem to have been quite a number]
he added a vague “you shall not make cuttings in flesh and beard” [27-28]
but then using his own invented verbs !
hence “the soul + flesh” shows here ,
and in Lev.21:1 “the soul + defiled + [=by] [=her] people=flesh” [consecration theme] ,
but Esau (in Lev.) turned the theme into “you shall not defile your flesh“
then ran out of ideas (as usual grin) at line (5) ,
thinking of one like “you shall not make baldness upon your head” , then searched
something reláted to head’ as “you will not shave the corner of your beard” , but
because the original line STILL hadn’t finished now he needed some verb related
to sháving wherefore he added “nor make cuttings in your flesh” —
we bet it went like that ?
conclusion :
it’s probable that God did say something like “you won’t cut yourself”
[not móre for He certainly would not give any “ammunition” to Esau] ;
Esau deleted those 2-3-4 lines when inserting his ‘circumcision theme’ ,
then – because he was bad in the ‘context department’ – he mistakenly
added it back as in an according to him ‘harmless version’
D)
Lev.23
Num.29 ‘a fire-offering’ at Atonement [Strange Fire theme]
– these “listings of feasts” chapters are chaotic ,
and ofcourse Esau could add – or remove – any aspect that he wanted ;
– there never was commanded ány fire offering ofcourse
since offering that to the idol caused the whole Adam’s strange fire theme ,
and since Atonement is about the birthsceptre and the gate
[see main ‘circumcision’ page]
it’s ofcourse nasty that Esau inserted this here [Lev.23:36] ;
– then ,
the ‘the·eighth day’ he placed in these two chapters “at Booths” ;